Favourable policies towards solar PV value chain creation:
Financial incentives like PLI schemes, capital investment subsidies, R&D tax credits, etc.
Mandated local content requirements & govt. procurement
in advancing economic, environmental & social equity
4 key takeaways
Growth rate of solar adoption varies across archetypes, calling for customized approaches across policy, technological, financial and capacity build levers
Increased adoption in solar energy will result in a plethora of socio-economic benefits globally, incl. ~25% drop in GHG emissions, 3-4x growth in green employment opportunities, ~9x reduction in mortality incidents, etc.
Cost of round-the-clock generation of solar energy will witness a 40%-60% decline by 2050 across archetypes & emerges as a key metric to track progress of solar adoption
Robust frameworks for collection & reporting of data across economic, environmental & social dimensions is crucial to track progress of solar adoption projects
We explore solar energy's transformative potential in advancing economic, social, and environmental equity, positioning it as a key driver in the global energy transition. Solar energy stands out as the most scalable and cost-effective clean technology, offering the highest potential for decentralized solutions at the lowest cost.
The International Solar Alliance (ISA) envisions a dramatic increase in global solar capacity, projecting more than a 20-fold expansion. While there is a consistent trend showing significant solar penetration, multiple pathways exist to achieve this scale.
We examine three key scenarios for global energy transition: Slow Transition, Dynamic Transition, and the most ambitious, SHINE. Each scenario explores potential solar-centric pathways, with the SHINE scenario identified as the most competitive, offering savings of up to $4 trillion in costs.
Our methodology is built on the creation of country archetypes, which assess different climate contexts and challenges across regions. These archetypes are analyzed through publicly available data and expert consultations, enabling the identification of tailored solutions. The report also explores differentiated strategies, recognizing that the path to solar adoption will vary across developed, emerging, and low-income economies, as well as small island developing states.
A comprehensive energy transition fueled by tripling of RE capacity, while ensuring people-centric development is crucial to meet 1.5oC goal set out in Paris accord
Different economies will contribute differently to this energy transition journey, basis their unique socio- economic circumstances
Four primary archetypes have been considered – High Income Countries (HICs), Emerging Economies (EEs), Low Income Countries (LICs) and Small Island Emerging States (SIDS)
Solar has emerged as the most promising clean energy technology, owing to its high potential, versatility for decentralization & economic viability
Variations in archetype-specific contexts and socio- economic characteristics necessitates differentiated solutions to further the adoption of solar/RE in each archetype
Defining characteristics
Hurdles in RE & solar
adoption
High Income Countries
Emerging Economies
Low Income Countries
Small Island Developing States
The archetypes have been reviewed and realigned for its relevance & effectiveness for Phase – II; they will be enriched with additional insights from scenario analysis activity
Note: Archetypes are based on 2024 income-based classification of countries provided by the World Bank with dynamic archetype allocation across each year basis GDP per capita
Absolute
decarbonization
Share of global
CO2 emissions
High capacity addition
4-5% Share
15+% CAGR
High capacity reqd to
meet NDC targets
Decoupling emissions
from growth
Emissions CAGR
(Global CAGR: 5.3%)
Mean Performer
3-4% Share
30% CAGR
High capacity reqd to
fuel growth
Enhancing energy
access
Population with electricity access (Global avg: 87%)
Increased Growth
1-2% Share
50+% CAGR
Moderate capacity
reqd to meet energy demand
Improving energy
security
MMtCO2e Emissions per GW (Global avg: 4.8)
Limited Adoption
1-2% Share
50+% CAGR
Low capacity reqd out
of global capacity
Strong inherent
financial position
>$0.5 Tr needed annually by 2030
Rapid cost-effective low
carbon transition
High access to
climate finance
2x funding gap (vs developed)
Rapid cost-effective low
carbon transition
Strong inherent
financial position
>$0.5 Tr needed annually by 2030
Rapid cost-effective low
carbon transition
Strong inherent
financial position
> $0.5 Tr needed annually by 2030
Rapid cost-effective low
carbon transition
Source: 1. IEA, Enerdata 2. IPCC, UNFCCC, ISA reports 3. OECD, 4. WEF – State of Climate Action report, 2023, 5. 20-25% not allocable; 6. Cumulative global solar capacity required to meet NDC pledges: ~11k GW; BCG Analysis
Identify potential for global solar adoption based on global demand for electricity (including off-grid solutions)
Develop scenarios for solar adoption to satisfy global demand while ensuring an equitable transition
Evaluate the uplift for each archetype across indicators spanning economic, environmental & social dimensions due to enhanced solar adoption
Identify key measures each archetype has to undertake across four pillars – policy, finance, technology & capacity build
High Income Countries
HP2
MP3
United States
Australia
Canada
Saudi Arabia
Spain
France
New Zealand
Austria
Chile
Swizerland
Emerging Economies
HP2
MP3
Brazil
India
Argentina
Mexico
Iran, Islamic Rep.
China
Nigeria
Egypt, Arab, Rep.
Indonesia
South Africa
Low Income Countries
HP2
MP3
Sudan
Ethiopia
Zambia
Chad
Yemen, Rep.
Cent. African Republic
South Sudan
Uganda
Guinea
Mozambique
Small Island Developing States(SIDS)
HP2
MP3
Cuba
Dominican Republican
Guinea-Bissau
Haiti
Jamaica
Papua New Guinea
Guyana
Suriname
Belize
Singapore
Source: BCG Analysis : 1. Practical solar potential for each nations has been estimated basis solar irradiation potential that has been adjusted for land availability for installation, population density for each location. 2. HP: High Potential. 3. MP: Medium Potential
The Solar Adoption Model (SAM) employs a comprehensive methodology incorporating economic, environmental, and social indicators to project solar energy adoption scenarios up to 2050. Key inputs include GDP and population projections, country-wise solar potential, NDC commitments, and electricity demand profiles. The model estimates intermediate outputs such as annual electricity consumption, solar energy penetration, grid expansion needs, and storage requirements across technologies. These insights enable the calculation of final outputs like yearly installed solar capacity, levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), investments in solar and storage infrastructure, and socio-economic benefits such as green employment growth and GHG emissions avoided.
The model draws from reliable data sources, including GDP and population forecasts from Oxford Economics and the World Bank, and solar potential data from IRENA and NREL. Key assumptions include dynamic renewable energy penetration based on country archetypes, solar efficiency improvements, and constant per capita energy consumption levels for specific income groups. Storage technologies, split between short- and long-duration solutions, and ancillary investments like grid infrastructure are also integrated into the framework. These projections align with SDG goals and aim to provide policymakers and stakeholders with actionable insights to drive sustainable solar adoption and address global climate challenges effectively.
Key model inputs
GDP, population projections
NDC commitments of representative countries
Country-wise practical solar potential
Daily and seasonal electricity demand profiles in representative countries
Historical energy-related investments, labour force and energy mix data
Expected technical efficiency improvements in solar PV systems
Projected cost curves for solar PV and associated storage solutions
Projected parameters / Intermediate outputs
Yearly, country-wise solar installed capacity
Levelized cost of electricity (incl. storage)
Investments required in solar installation, storage installation and transmission & distribution
% share of population with electricity access
Share of fossil fuels in total imports
GHG emissions avoided Mortality rate
Green employment generated and employment growth rate
Model outputs
Country-wise annual electricity consumption
Annual storage requirements across technology types
Expected penetration of solar and renewable energy in electricity generation mix
Grid expansion – Annual transmission & distribution capacity additions required
Population growth rate
Total investments in solar
energy technology
GDP growth rate
GDP per capita
Employment growth rate
Share of imports in fossil fuel
usage
Total electricity consumption
Solar irradiation potentia
GHG emissions per capita
Emission intensity of GDP
Energy generation mix
Installed capacities
Share of solar energy in total
installed capacity
Share of population having
access to electy
Energy affordability
(Levelized cost of Energy)
Green employment growth
Mortality rate
Few metrics have been considered constant across scenarios to derive additional impact parameters
Source: Oxford Economics
Source: World Bank
projected basis historical GDP per capita data
projected basis historical data across parameters
projected basis literature study, Source: NREL
Few metrics have been considered constant across scenarios to derive additional impact parameters
Source: UNFCCC NDC registry
Source: Government data portals, research
Source: IRENA
Source: NREL, USA
Source: Energy web-portals of representative countries, research
Source: BCG Analysis
The International Solar Alliance (ISA) envisions a dramatic
increase in global solar capacity, projecting it will grow over 20
times by 2050. Currently at 1.2 terawatts (TW) in 2023, ISA’s
vision sees solar capacity reaching 26 TW by mid-century,
positioning solar energy at the forefront of the global energy
transition.
While major studies vary on the degree of solar penetration, all
indicate a clear trend of significant solar expansion. Solar energy
is widely recognized as the most scalable and cost-effective
renewable solution, essential for addressing climate change and
enabling decentralized energy systems.
Solar’s key strengths include unmatched scalability, cost-
effectiveness, and ability to rapidly deploy across diverse
regions. As the cheapest renewable energy source, solar
power is increasingly favored by governments and industries
alike, making it a natural choice for meeting energy demands
while reducing carbon emissions. The declining cost of solar
technologies, along with advances in energy storage and grid
integration, solidify Solar's role in the future global energy
systems
Global installed solar capacity in 2023: 1200 GW
All units in GW
World Energy Outlook 2023
Energy Outlook (2024 Edition)
Pathway to Net Zero emissions
World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023
New Energy Outlook 2024
Business-as-usual
2030
2050
4715
12724
2325
7445
-
-
-
-
-
-
Announced Pledges
2030
2050
5405
16336
-
-
4700
10000
3500
9000
-
-
Net-Zero Emissions
2030
2050
6150
19180
2743
13593
5300
20000
5400
18500
3650
15300
Global solar installed
capacity (2023)
ISA's solar installed
capacity vision (2050)
The International Solar Alliance (ISA) envisions a dramatic increase in global solar capacity, projecting it will grow over 20 times by 2050. Currently at 1.2 terawatts (TW) in 2023, ISA’s vision sees solar capacity reaching 26 TW by mid-century, positioning solar energy at the forefront of the global energy transition.
While major studies vary on the degree of solar penetration, all indicate a clear trend of significant solar expansion. Solar energy is widely recognized as the most scalable and cost-effective renewable solution, essential for addressing climate change and enabling decentralized energy systems.
Solar’s key strengths include unmatched scalability, cost-effectiveness, and ability to rapidly deploy across diverse regions. As the cheapest renewable energy source, solar power is increasingly favored by governments and industries alike, making it a natural choice for meeting energy demands while reducing carbon emissions. The declining cost of solar technologies, along with advances in energy storage and grid integration, solidify Solar's role in the future global energy systems
1.Solar PV is the cheapest RE technology available LCOE ($/kWh)
2. Solar offers the highest potential (EJ )
1. Lifecycle emissions considered (incl. infrastructure, supply chain, etc.) Source: IEA, OWID, IRENA, NREL, IPCC
3. Solar emits lower CO2 emissions per GWH of electricity consumpsion than most RE
4. Solar is the most used decentralized solution, making it highly versatile Off-grid capacity (GW)
1. Lifecycle emissions considered (incl. infrastructure, supply chain, etc.) Source: IEA, OWID, IRENA, NREL, IPCC
Energy Source
Small-scale
(kW)
Mid-scale
(MW)
Large-scale
(GW)
Small (kW) scale [in forms of Solar Home Systems (SHS) and lights] which allows penetration in historically disconnected areas
Small (kW) scale [in form of utility-scale ground-mounted PV plants] to cater to industrial demand centers
At low scales (<1 MW)
At higher scales (1 MW - 600+ MW)
Source: IRENA: Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022
1. Geography-depedent
Solar installed capacities (TW)
HIC
EE
LIC
SIDS
Slow Transition
scenario
Dynamic Transition
scenario
SHINE scenario
Solar penetration in electricity mix (2050)
24.7%
45.2%
74.5%
RE penetration in electricity mix (2050)
75.9%
85.1%
85.1%
Source: Solar Adoption Model
SHINE scenario surpasses Net-Zero requirements of solar capacity
Transitioning the SHINE pathway into Net-Zero is cheaper compared
to
transitioning from the DTS scenario
Transition cost for DTS to Net-Zero
Transition cost for SHINE to Net-Zero
Transitioning from SHINE scenario results in cost savings worth ~USD 4Tn. & should be the preferred pathway for solar adoption on the journey towards global Net Zero
Dynamic Transition
Dynamic Transition to Net Zero pathway
Net Zero
SHINE
SHINE to Net-Zero pathway
1. Includes cost of manufacturing, installation, etc. Excludes the cost of storage
Improvement in emission intensity of GDP 1
Enhancement inemployment opportunities with ~4mn additional jobs for women
Reduction in GHG emissions1
Reduction in incidents of mortality1
Attributable to solar energy
The transition to solar energy delivers significant benefitsacross environmental, economic, and social dimensions,regardless of the adoption scenario. Solar expansionleads to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG)emissions, with the SHINE scenario avoiding up to 46gigatons of CO2e emissions by 2050 compared to thebaseline. Additionally, the levelized cost of electricity(LCOE) decreases significantly, from $32/MWh in theSlow Transition scenario to $21/MWh in SHINE. Thisreduction in energy costs improves af fordability, makingrenewable energy more accessible across various incomegroups globally.
On the economic front, solar capacity expansion drives massive job creation, particularly in the green economy. Under the SHINE scenario, an estimated 27.5 million jobs are created, with 11 million directly linked to the solar sector. These employment opportunities span installation, operations, and related industries, offering a pathway for inclusive economic growth. Investments in solar
infrastructure and grid enhancements further stimulate local economies and reduce reliance on fossil fuel imports, thereby enhancing energy security.
Social benefits of solar adoption are equally transformative. Increased solar access improves energy equity, providing electricity to underserved populations and enhancing overall quality of life. Furthermore, the reduction in GHG emissions mitigates climate-related health risks, avoiding thousands of premature deaths annually. Together, these benefits underscore solar energy's potential to address climate goals, foster economic development, and promote societal well-being on a global scale
Installed Solar Capacity
GHG Emissions Avoided
-
(Baseline)
~37Gt CO2e
~46 Gt CO2e
Levelized cost
of Electricity
$32/MWh
$24/MWh
$21/MWh
Jobs Created
12.5Mn
~37Gt CO2e
~46Gt CO2e
5Mn
7Mn
11Mn
Economic Parameters
Population growth (mn)
GDP growth (bn USD)
GDP growth (bn USD)
Combined GDP for archetypes
Drivers
GDP per capita (USD)
Cumulative GDP per capita (calculated from total GDP of archetype and total population)
Total annual investments in solar energy technology (Cumulative) (bn USD)
Cumulative GDP per capita (calculated from total GDP of archetype and total population)
Govt Solar expenditure (bn USD)
Expected expenditure by government in solar basis historical allotment in budget
Ancillary infrastructure investment (bn USD)
Additional investments required over solar in transmission and distribution network setup
Fiscal policies
Fiscal policies that can be implemented by government to impact solar/RE adoption
Impact
Employment growth (mn)
Expected cumulative workforce in a particular year inclusive of jobs due to solar adoption
Share of imports in fossil fuel usage
Share of total expenditure spent in importing fossil fuels as part of supply mix
(both solar installations and accompanying storage
requirements)
The government has to adopt the role of a “catalytic financier” rather than the primary financier.The governmenthas to adopt the role of a “catalyticfinancier” ratherthan the primaryfinancier.
T&D investments are a key factor in ensuring affordability for solar and RE technologies
Improved distribution also help in bringing down losses which ultimately reduces the per unit cost of electricity being produced
Transmission and Distribution are not just the requirement of renewable energy but is a fundamental necessity to bring electricity to demand centers regardless of generation mix
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Slow Transition Investment Req. in T&D
SSHINE Investment Req. in T&D
SHINE Investment Req. in T&D
Jobs to be created are directly proportional to the installed capacity of solar in a country With largest share, EE and HIC will generate ~9 million and 17 million jobs respectively by 2050
STS scenario projects increased energy imports in LICs due to large share of off-grid and low electricity access. A major shift to RE based on the SHINE pathway will bring in energy sufficiency
Likewise, SIDS have the highest dependency on imported fuel due to due to heavy reliance on diesel generators. Considering the geographical disconnect with other countries, a shift to RE in SHINE scenario will increase energy security
Input Parameters
Total electricity consumption (TWh)
Total electricity consumption of all countries in the archetype
Solar irradiation potential (TWh)
Total solar generation potential basis insolation, area (with inaccessible land area removed)
Drivers
Climate policies
Policies based on climate based outcomes which can promote RE/Solar adoption
Installed capacities (TW)
Total solar capacity installed in a particular year
Impact
Share of solar energy in totalinstalled capacity
Rate of solar penetration in electricity mix
GHG emissions per capita(t CO2e/ capita)
Combined metric for per capita GHG emissions in CO2 equivalent for each archetype
Emission intensity of GDP (kg/$)
Cost of marginal increase in GDP in terms of emissions produced
Total estimated investment required by 2050
Split of investment across archetypes is skewed more to emerging economies in Slow Transition scenario
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Total estimated investment required by 2050
With increase in across archetype, the investment is more spread between the largest consumer, i.e. HIC and EE
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Total estimated investment required by 2050
Increased share of solar in SHINE scenario spreads the investment requirement to more equitably across countries
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Share of population having accessto electricity
Percentage of population with some degree of access to electricity
Energy affordability (Levelized cost of Energy) (USD/MWh)
Lifetime cost of generating 1 unit of electricity from a solar electricity generation setup
Green employment growth
Cumulative amount of jobs added due to increased installations of solar
Additional Mortality incidents Avoided
Number of deaths avoided because of mitigation of harmful effects of GHG emissions by displacing fossil fuel with RE/Solar
Electricity Access across Archetypes
High – Income Nations
100%
100%
100%
Near universal electricity access
Mature grid infrastructure with near complete on-grid supply
Emerging Economies
95%
100%
100%
Significant electricity access with gaps in rural and underserved areas
Mix of on-grid and off-grid electricity supply with push on on-grid solution with increased urbanization
Electricity Access across Archetypes
Low-Income Nations
100%
100%
100%
Major electricity access deficits, particularly in rural areas
Weak infrastructure and reliance on off-grid diesel generators / biomass
SIDS
80%
92%
100%
Heavy dependence on imported fossil fuels
Unreliable grid infrastructure prone to disruption
Energy Consumption 13.76 TWh
Tier
Minimum Req.
T1
12
T2
200
T3
1000
T4
3425
T5
8219
Share of Population
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Population 123.4 mn
36%
residential
consumption in total electricity
200 Wh per
capita consumption for population with electricity access
55%
Electricity access
More energy available to support existing consumption pattern
T1
0%
T2
100%
T3
0%
T4
0%
T5
0%
40%
200Wh
61%
Flexibility of distributed solar can be used to increase share of electricity available for residential use
More energy available to support existing consumption pattern
T1
0%
T2
100%
T3
0%
T4
0%
T5
0%
40%
200Wh
61%
With options from kW capacity to MW, solar has the potential to bring basic electricity access to population in LIC previously devoid of power in cleanest possible way
Solar can be the pathway of introducing electricity to population in Tier 1-3 while also catering to sophisticated demand patterns from Tier 4 and 5
Source: Solar Adoption Model, World Bank Multi-Tiered Framework
Jobs created due to solar installations 2023
Mn. jobs
Operational Jobs
Construction Jobs
2023 |
2030 |
2040 |
2050 |
Total |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
10 + |
|
|
|
|
|
18 + |
|
|
|
|
|
0.21 + |
|
|
|
|
0.09 + |
||
Source: Solar Adoption Model
With 40% women workforce, solar PV already surpasses other energy sectors in representation of women (e.g., wind at 21%, oil and gas at 22%).
Solar PV is projected to generate 28 mn jobs by 2050, offering ~11 million opportunities for women across technical, managerial, and entrepreneurial roles.
Women account for 47% of jobs in solar manufacturing and 58% in administrative roles, making these key entry points into the solar sector.
Women hold 17% of senior management roles in solar PV, despite 30% in general management. Solar PV’s growth offers a chance to change this by implementing gender quotas, mentorship programs, and transparent promotion policies
The cumulative reduction in GHG emissions by substituting current fossil fuel consumption with renewable electricity can help avoid ~19 million deaths by 2050
Hospitals and clinics with reliable electricity supply (including solar) have been able to reduce maternal mortality by ensuring better maternal care, particularly during childbirth. In Sub Saharan Africa, solar-powered health centers are helping to reduce deaths from childbirth complications.
2023
2030
2040
2050
Total
High – Income Nations
Emerging Economies
Low-Income Nations
SIDS
Solar energy provides a cost-effective solution for reducing GHG emissions while expanding electricity access.
Distributed systems enable greater renewable energy penetration in underserved areas, offering both emissions reduction and increased energy access without the need for extensive grid infrastructure
Assigns a monetary cost to carbon emissions, incentivizing industries to reduce their emissions
Require utilities or industries to source a specific percentage of their energy from renewables
Governments prioritize purchasing environmentally friendly products, including solar energy systems, in public projects
Direct government funding or subsidies for the research and development of innovative solar technologies and renewable energy solution
Reductions in tax liabilities offered by the government to encourage specific behaviors Can take the form of tax credits, deductions, or accelerated depreciation
Financial tools like green bonds, which are loans or securities issued to fund RE projects Designed to attract investors by ensuring that the funds are used for environmentally friendly
Adjust the price of energy to reflect the environmental and social costs of carbon emissions Feed-in Tariffs (FITs), where solar energy producers are paid a fixed premium for feeding energy into the grid
Government-funded grants or subsidies provided to reduce the upfront costs of RE installations
Scaling solar energy to meet global targets involves three critical components: cost reductions, infrastructure expansion, and financial mobilization.
Generation cost for solar has steadily declined due to technological advancements, economies of scale, and cheaper photovoltaic (PV) modules. As global solar adoption increases, these factors along with lower storage and installation costs continue to reduce the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), making solar more competitive than fossil fuels and nuclear.
Infrastructure investment in storage, transmission, and distribution is critical. As the SHINE scenario projects a 20-fold solar capacity increase by 2050, storage is essential for round the-clock availability by balancing intermittent solar generation. Additionally, a 2-4x increase in grid expansion is needed to support the rise in solar generation.
The transition cannot rely solely on government funding. Private capital must be mobilized to bridge the investment gap. Governments should shift from being primary financiers to acting as "catalytic financiers," facilitating and incentivizing private investment to fund the growth of solar energy.
Demand (as % of daily demand)
Demand (as % of daily demand)
Slow transition requires significant storage basis current trend of RE penetration with 34 TWh of storage at 76% RE penetration
Higher RE penetration requires 50% increase in storage due to higher degree of variability in electricity mix
Increased share of Solar within the RE mix at same RE penetration requires 100% more storage due to diurnal nature of solar
1. Planned storage capacity considers both pumped hydropower and battery storage Source: Representative country energy portals, Solar Adoption Model
Storage capacity today has been planned to primarily meet NDC targets, that are usually limited to 2030
Given the non-monolithic nature of storage, different storage technologies (eg: PSH vs battery) need different implementation lead-times
Considering these aspects, a roadmap for expansion of storage capacity beyond 2030 is thus the need of the hour if the world wishes to further increase RE penetration through the DTS and SHINE scenarios
Slow transition scenario requires significant storage basis current track of RE penetration
Increase in RE penetration >60% pushes for a near equal split as long duration storage is required for seasonal variations
Increased share of solar in RE mix does not affect the share of long duration storage in the mix
Configuration of two water reservoirs at different elevations that allows water flow between them to generate power
Provides cheaper long-term storage
Provides high capacity, long-duration storage
More cost-effective than BESS over a longer period
Cost of scaling energy vs capacity is low
Slower to deploy – High project lead time (5-10 yrs.)
Potentially damaging to ecology / populations
High initial capex
Enables conversion of energy generated from RE to chemical energy in cells to be stored and utilized later
Provides cost-effective short term storag
Fast deployment - Low project lead-time
Smaller land parcel needed with flexible installation
Low upfront capex
Prohibitively expensive at higher duration storage
More expensive cost of storage over lifetime
Disposal could lead to soil, water and air pollution
While low in initial investment, scaling BESS becomes expensive with scale due to high storage cost ( ~$480 per kWh). Higher duration1 costs exponentially more
Despite lower cost of storage (~$290 per kWh), high upfront cost is required for PSH along with long lead time of 5-10 years for project implementation
2024
2030
2040
2050
Investments in PSH
PSH capacity installed (TWh)
High upfront investment with delayed return
Initiate projects now to build significant PSH capacity in next 5-6 years
Decrease battery costs in coming years through tech improvements and scale (so that they can cover future impacts of unavailable PSH capacity)
Globally, investments in solar energy have increased to occupy upto 0.3% of total GWP…
…however, the envisioned penetration rates across scenarios call for a multifold increase in expenditure
US$
19-20Tn.
(~US $770 Bn. annually)
upto
~1.3%
Of GWP in estimated timeframe
US$
~28-29Tn.
(~US $1000 Bn. annually)
upto
~2%
Of GWP in estimated timeframe
US$
~36-38Tn.
(~US $1400 Bn. annually)
upto
~2.1%
Of GWP in estimated timeframe
Increased variability due to greater share of RE in electricity generation mix required increased storage
Increase in share of solar in RE mix drives the requirement even more
With RE penetration of more than 60%, long duration storage is required to account for seasonal variation while battery storage caters to daily variations
Lithium batteries and Pumped Hydro are the most viable options for short and long duration storage respectively basis technological maturity and commercial availability. More technologies may emerge in future
Current rate of storage development is not enough to cater to requirement of increased RE electricity generation
PSH growth is stagnant and faces dual challenge of large lead time and high capex. Even with drop in prices, large scale long duration storage will be prohibitively expensive through lithium batteries alone.
Immediate investments are required in PSH and other storage technologies to enable reliable electricity supply from planned RE projects.
Globally planned capacity addition for storage solutions is sufficient in the short-term, however a comprehensive roadmap for long-term deployment is necessary to meet DTS & SHINE requirements
Source: NREL, Solar Adoption Model 1.Small Module Reactors 2. Steigerwald et.al (2023)
Sustained drop in cost of PV modules, associated components of storage (battery cells, PSH) and installation is key to driving global adoption
LCOE decreases as scale of adoption of solar and storage increases, SHINE scenario requires significant drop in capital costs for solar PV and storage solutions
Considering the costs of setting up a new plant, solar energy is already cost competitive compared to fossil fuel and other low carbon solutions
Other RE sources (wind and hydropower) are expected to be close competitors to solar energy across archetypes
Small scale nuclear alternatives, particularly SMRs1 , have clean energy applications but are prone to regulatory hurdles and are currently not profitable even in most optimistic scenario2
LCOE (USD/MWh)
In the medium term (2030-2035), solar plus storage is likely to be costlier than alternative energy sources such as wind energy in HICs or fossil fuels in LICs
In the long term (post 2040), solar energy will emerge as the cheapest energy source for electricity generation, across archetypes
Increased electricity generation from RE
calls
for further expansion of the existing grid.
Sustained drop in cost of PV modules, associated components of storage (battery cells, PSH) and installation is key to driving global adoption
Ensure last-mile, continuous access to electricity
Effective integration of storage systems for supply-demand balancing
…with insufficient T&D infrastructure
posing
hindrances in RE adoption worldwide
India witnessed upto 30GW of Power Purchase Agreements going unsold in recently concluded auctions due to limited transmission infrastructure
In South Africa, only 1 GW was awarded out of the 4.2 GW under the latest renewable energy procurement program for independent power producers owing to limited grid capabilities
In United States, slugging interconnection processes and need for grid modernization has led to over 2.6 TW of clean energy projects languishing in gridlock
Accommodating solar penetrations envisioned in SHINE scenario requires doubling existing transmission capacities…
…calling for considerable, planned investments accommodating timelines for deployment as well
STS
~US$ 15-16 Tn.
(~US$ 570 Bn. annually)
DTS
~US$ 18 Tn.
(~US$ 660 Bn. annually)
SHINE
~US$ 24-26 Tn.
(~US$ 660 Bn. annually)
Annual expenditures in grid expansion are expected to grow 2-4x from current levels to support solar adoption across scenarios
Transmission capacity additions (TW-miles)
Transmission capacity additions (GW-miles)
Transmission & distribution expansion requirements envisioned in each scenario outstrips the planned additions by respective governments
There exists an urgent need to proactively prepare a domestic grid expansion roadmap that meets the requirements & plan for associated investments
STS
SHINE
DTS
Planned TW-miles
Source: Representative country energy digital portals, Solar Adoption Model
Unlocking solar energy’s potential requires strategies tailored to different country archetypes, recognizing varying energy needs. High-income countries must build on their lead in renewable energy by accelerating the transition of their legacy systems to green technologies, aiming for a further reduction in emissions through policy and technological interventions.
Emerging economies, as the largest electricity demand centers, are key drivers of global solar adoption. However, their rapid growth must focus on decoupling emissions from economic development, ensuring sustainable growth.
For low-income countries, large-scale solar adoption is critical for addressing electricity access. Decentralized solar systems, along with innovative financing, can overcome adoption barriers and provide affordable energy where grid access is limited.
In small island developing states (SIDS), solar energy is essential for reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels and mitigating climate change. Prioritizing resilient, disaster-proof solar installations with battery storage will enhance energy security and sustainability in these vulnerable regions.
Absolute
decarbonization
68%
Share of global
CO2 emissions
Economic growth expected to stabilize
Stable
consumption,
inline with
economic growth
3%-5%
Leverage
headstart in RE
adoption
(~43% in 2022)
498,172
(~2.7% to be tapped by 2050)
4.4
Driven by incentive schemes, favourable policies & private sector participation
12%
Decoupling
emissions from
growth
7.3%
Emissions CAGR
(Global CAGR: 5.3%)
Fastest growth rate among archetypes
Industrial
electrification for
economic growth
5%-10%
Fossil fuels with modest impact on development
1,416,911
(~1.5% to be tapped by 2050)
5.2
Catalytic financing by private sector, along with growth of local manufacturing capabilities
11%
Enhancing
energy
access
49%
Population with
electricity
access (Global avg: 87%)
Development
coupled with rise
in population
Lower quantum of
electricity needed
to provide basic
access
20%-30%
Primary RE source to shift from hydro to solar
398,058
(<0.1% to be tapped by 2050)
5.9
Low-cost & low-risk financing, demand aggregation systems & growth of downstream battery value chain
14%
Improving energy
security
10-20%
Fossil fuel imports
as % of GDP
(Global avg: 8-10%)
Moderate
economic growth
across nations
Electrification of service sectors (incl. tourism)
10%-12%
RE adoption
driven by
NDC commitments
12,473
(<1% to be tapped by 2050)
4.9
Technical innovations to drive scale for distributed solutions
13%
Source: IEA, Enerdata, Our World in Data, Oxford Economics, Solar GIS, Solar Adoption Model
High-income countries have made significant progress in renewable energy (RE) penetration, contributing to over 60% of global cumulative emissions. Their focus must now shift towards increasing solar penetration within RE and transitioning approximately 2.6 TW of legacy fossil fuel assets_front to green energy generation by 2050. Solar energy is already economically viable compared to conventional energy sources, but achieving further cost parity with RE sources requires sustained investments.
To meet solar adoption targets, HICs must focus on policy incentives, such as tax credits and phased-out fossil fuel subsidies, alongside technological and financial enablers like collaborative manufacturing and private sector financing. HICs face supply chain risks due to reliance on regionally concentrated solar component suppliers and need to diversify their sources to hedge risks.
HICs will need to invest approximately $18 trillion by 2050 to achieve solar PV and storage system targets. Over 80% of the solar investment needed by 2050 is expected to come from domestic sources, with public funding catalyzing private investments. Furthermore, HICs should support capacity-building efforts in emerging and low-income economies to enhance global energy transitions
Economic Growth
Emissions
…with decreasing contribution to cumulative global GHG emissions
HIC
EE
LIC
SIDS
Source: Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model
Electricity consumption expected to stabilize with slowest growth rate among archetypes…
Electricity consumption (TWh)
…with consumption concentrated in industry, commercial & transport ectors to promote economic growth
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Transport
Others
Source: IEA, Solar Adoption Model
RE has been emerging as a key energy source in electricity mix over the past decade…
Source: IEA, Solar Adoption Model
Fossil fuels
Nuclear
Renewables
…and is expected to transform into the dominant source for electricity generation in high-income countries
RE penetration in electricity generation mix
Solar energy is expected to compete with wind energy, but will turn more viable latest by 2045 (Slow transition scenario)
Continued investment in solar and storage solutions will result in deeper cost reductions, helping achieve cost parity with wind energy faster
Investment requirements
US$
4-5Tn.
(~US$ 150-170 Bn. annually)
~0.2%-0.3%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
US$
~7-8Tn.
(~US$ 300 Bn. annually)
~0.6%-0.7%
Of GWP in estimated timeframe
US$
~11-13Tn.
(~US$ 400-450 Bn. annually)
upto
~1%
Of GWP in estimated timeframe
Source: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Institutionalization of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), enabling large-scale solar manufacturing & adoption:
30% Investment Tax Credit (ITC) and $26/ MWh Production Tax Credit (PTC) in all new clean energy capital investments
Production-linked tax credits for domestic production of solar components like cells, modules, inverters, etc
Establishment of a National Green Bank with $27 Bn. in funding to support solar energy projects
Establishment of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA)
Broad scope, covering infrastructure required for clean energy deployment at scale
$6 bn funding for battery manufacturing
$65 billion grid expansions to accommodate RE
France declared a Multiannual Energy Plan (MEP), providing market
certainty & favourable environment for long-term
private sector investments
Several policies aimed at encouraging private sector
involvement in solar projects
Feed-in-tariffs guaranteeing a fixed price for solar energy generated by private producers over a long-term contract; later transitioned to feed-in premiums
Long-term, competitive power purchase agreements, reducing revenue uncertainty for private investors
Risk-sharing between public sector and private investors, with government providing guarantees or co-investment in key projects
20%-60% tax credit on capital investments towards establishment or capacity expansion of storage systems and solar PV manufacturing
Initiatives that put an explicit
price on GHG emissions from
sectors covered under each
national law
Carbon pricing mechanisms
can drive RE adoption
Incentivize usage of clean fuels
Additional revenue to governments who can channel it for further deployment/ catalyze private sector financing in clean energy
Several HICs have already
implemented carbon pricing mechanisms
Source: Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model
Clean energy assistance (2022) (USD Bn.)
Two key impact areas for investment
AFD, a French public international bank, signed a $13mn. credit facility agreement with GCB Bank, Ghana to mobilize green loans, investment grants and technical assistance to finance small & medium- scale RE projects in GhanaAFD, a French public international bank, signed a $13mn. credit facility agreement with GCB Bank, Ghana to mobilize green loans, investment grants and technical assistance to finance small & medium- scale RE projects in Ghana
US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) invested $30 mn. in equity investment in critical minerals firm, Techmet Ltd. to support development of a nickel & cobalt mining facility in Brazil
Investment in supply chain build dominated by the private sector, pointing to the need to diversify & de-risk existing global supply chain
HICs need to mobilize
developmental
assistance
funds further to assist at-
scale
clean energy adoption
in financially
constrained
nations across archetypes
Source: AFD, US International Development Finance Corporation, IEA Govt Spend Tracker
…necessitating the need to amplify clean energy assistance aimed at building robust, cost-competitive supply chains immune to disruptions
1. Australia and Chile are yet to establish battery manufacturing centers
Upto 20x growth in storage capacities necessary for projected solar adoption rates
Storage deployment (TWh)
A mix of long and short duration storage solutions necessary to cater to on-grid & distributed demand
Storage deployment (TWh)
Source: Solar Adoption Model
In the United States, RE projects worth over 1.9 TW is on hold in interconnection queues, seeking connection to the electric grid due to a lack of transmission infrastructure.
In Europe, each nation has internal transmission capacities planned, however cross-border transmission has largely been overlooked. For example, 2 out of 3 interconnections from Spain to France is not expected to come online before 2030
Significant lead time for construction of transmission lines
Requires consensus of multiple stakeholders with competing interests, leading to long bureaucratic processes
Electricity generation from fossil fuels increases till 2030 even as penetration decreases…
Electricity generation (x 1000 TWh)
…leading to ~80% of legacy fossil fuelassets_front running the risk of being unutilized
Installed capacity (TW)
1. Australia and Chile are yet to establish battery manufacturing centers
Cumulative GHG emissions for EE
Additional CO2e emissions saved in SHINE scenario
Lives saved from reduced GHG emissions
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Cumulative Jobs created due to Solar Penetration
Average jobs created per year by 2050
increment in operational jobs
increment in construction jobs
Environmental Benefits
Social Benefits
Economic Benefits
Further incentivization of RE adoption via flexible tax credits, phased out fossil fuel subsidies, etc.
Revision of grid expansion plans & preparation of a T&D roadmap meeting requirements
Improve development assistance to developing nations by catalyzing private sector funding
Collaborative manufacturing platforms for solar PV and storage systems
Technical assistance (cross-border IP sharing, tech.expertise) for supply chain build in developing nations
Evaluation of existing fossil fuelassets_front and feasibility of green transition
Reduced dependence on transmission capacity through virtual power plants
Enhance private sector participation in clean energy sector through catalytic financing
Incentivization schemes for private utilities to improve existing transmission & distribution infrastructure
Establishment of satellite campuses of organizations for easier disbursal of R&D finance
Support local workforce deployment in solar energy services in developing nations
Ensure smooth transition for workers engaged in fossil fuel-related businesses to solar-based energy generation
Regulatory frameworks to boost clean energy adoption
Higher share of national budget allocated for clean energy technologies and increased share of solar in energy budget
Accelerated private investments in RE and solar technologies, leading to deeper cost reductions of solar PV & associated storage systems
The California Solar Initiative set a strong precedent for large-scale solar adoption by offering performance-based rebates, which helped surpass the original 3,000 MW goal by 2016. This approach fostered innovation and competition among solar installers, showcasing how government programs can drive growth in renewable energy, particularly by leveraging economic incentives.
Revision of existing grid expansion plans considering requirements from solar adoption perspective & preparation of a comprehensive roadmap, taking into consideration lead time for implementation of technologies
Enhanced grid capacity to balance demand and intermittencies in RE supply, reduced transaction costs, delays and uncertainties in RE project approval and deployment
Enhance development assistance finance to LICs and EEs:
Increased quantum of low-risk, official development assistance (ODA) to LICs and EEs
Private sector participation in recipient nation in deployment of clean energy, alleviating strain on national budgets
Accelerated private sector funding in HIC nations
In Ethiopia’s case, the Scaling Solar initiative, facilitated by the World Bank, is an excellent reflection of how public-private financing partnerships can be leveraged to attract private sector investment. The World Bank provided guarantees and financial de-risking mechanisms that incentivized the private sector to engage in large-scale solar projects. This partnership allowed Ethiopia to secure significant international investment despite its financial and infrastructural challenges, making the country a prime example of how development assistance, risk-sharing, and private sector incentives can work together.
Build domestic partnerships within private sector or between public and private sector to co-fund R&D and promote collaborative manufacturing programs for solar PV systems
The European Battery Alliance fosters collaboration between industry, research institutions and member governments to develop a competitive, sustainable battery value chain in the EU
Improve domestic battery manufacturing capacity for use in utility-scale and distributed systems; diversify risk from utilizing a geographically concentrated supply chain
Provide technical assistance (cross-border sharing of intellectual property, technical expertise) & investments to EEs and LICs that have potential for developing robust battery supply chains Ensure stable market demand through high product quality and reliability
Pipeline of larger quantum of private financing as development assistance to EEs and LICs
Promote establishment of a robust battery supply chain at source (reduced costs) in high-potential EEs and LICs to satisfy global & local demand
Evaluation of existing fossil fuelassets_front and feasibility of transition to renewable energy plants over the longer run
Decision on potential lower utilization of legacy assets_front
Reduced capital investments in renewable plants, leading to improved affordability
Establishment of virtual power plants to reduce
dependence on transmission and distribution:
Limit the need for high transmission capacity requirements over long distances & subsequent investments. Device owners to be compensated for their contribution to the grid as well.
South Africa’s Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (REIPPPP) not only facilitated solar energy growth through competitive bidding but also created a framework for the evaluation of existing fossil fuel assets_front and the gradual transition to renewable energy. The program's design allowed South Africa to assess the long- term viability of transitioning from its coal-heavy energy infrastructure toward cleaner alternatives like solar. This ongoing evaluation is crucial as it informs the feasibility of replacing aging coal plants with renewable energy facilities, ensuring a sustainable energy future
Enhance private sector participation in clean energy through catalytic financing:
Blended finance models to be developed along with MDBs, combining grants with concessional loans or guarantees to de-risk investments
Co-investment or providing first-loss capital for small and medium-scale organizations in solar energy space
Tax incentives such as accelerated depreciation of solar plants, additional tax credits for green investments, etc.
Improve domestic battery manufacturing capacity for use in utility-scale and distributed systems; diversify risk from utilizing a geographically concentrated supply chain
Accelerated private investments in RE and solar technologies, leading to deeper cost reductions of solar PV & associated storage systems
Performance-linked grants and incentives to utilities that meet specific targets (RE integration into grid, grid expansion/upgradation progress, etc.)
Higher investment in developing modernized transmission and distribution system; enhanced interest from private utilities in financing the same
Disburse finance for R&D in other archetypes through satellite campuses of research organizations, educational institutions, etc.
Reduced strain on national budget & increased transparency while ensuring adequate developmental assistance is provided to other nations
Support local workforce development in solar energy deployment services in other archetypes by investing in education and vocational training programs
Reskilling programs for workers transitioning from fossil fuel-related industries to solar energy sector
Promote establishment of a robust battery supply chain at source (reduced costs) in high-potential EEs and LICs to satisfy global & local demand
Ensure efficient utilization of workforce and their smooth transition from fossil-fuel based to solar- based energy generation
Emerging economies are expected to be the primary drivers of global solar adoption, given their status as the largest electricity demand centers. Rapid economic growth, coupled with rising populations, will continue to increase electricity consumption. However, EEs must balance this growth with environmental performance by decoupling emissions from development. Solar energy, already more economically viable than conventional sources, will play a key role in achieving this balance.
Challenges in energy transition include investor confidence being affected by opaque processes and the financial health of utilities, as well as limited domestic solar manufacturing capacity. To overcome these challenges, EEs need to focus on expanding transmission capacity, grid modernization, and creating a robust domestic solar PV value chain.
The total investment requirement for EEs by 2050 is projected to be $20 trillion for solar PV and storage systems, along with $11 trillion for grid expansion. Public financing and policy enablers, such as carbon pricing and financial incentives, will be critical in catalyzing private sector involvement in solar projects.
Economic Growth
EEs are expected to witness rapid economic growth in the future, faster than global average of 2.3%...
GDP (US$ trillions)
Emissions
…and is expected to witness the simultaneous decoupling of emissions from economic growth
Emissions intensity of GDP (MatCO2e/Tn. USD)
Source: Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model
Emerging Economies are expected to remain the highest electricity demand centers globally…
Electricity consumption (TWh)
…with expansion of share of industry, commercial & transport sectors in consumption
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Transport
Others
Source: IEA, Solar Adoption Model
An optimal mix of utility-scale solutions and distributed solutions will be key in achieving universal electricity access in Emerging Economies
Source: World Bank, Energy Monitor, Linard et al. Population Distribution, Settlement Patterns and Accessibility across Africa in 2010.
Practical solar energy generation potential
(TWh)
Solar installed capacity
(TW) (2022)
CO2 emission potential
(tCO2/MWh)
Levelized cost of electricity (USD/MWh)
Solar energy is expected to compete with wind energy, but will turn more viable latest by 2045 (Slow transition scenario)
Continued investment in solar and storage solutions will result in deeper cost reductions, helping achieve cost parity with other RE sources faster
There exists a need for additional policies (eg: carbon pricing) to drive investments in solar & improve its cost-competitiveness
Investment requirements
US$
12-13Tn.
(~US$ 450-500 Bn. annually)
~0.9%- 1.2%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
US$
~15-17Tn.
(~US$ 600-700 Bn. annually)
upto
~1.5%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
US$
~19-20Tn.
(~US$ 700-750 Bn. annually)
upto
~2.3%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
EE governments contribute significantly towards solar investments…
Internal sources
Govt. budget spend
FDI investments
Private sector funds
2021
2022
2023
… however, the relevance of solar in RE sector is yet to translate into the overall energy space
Solar investment as % of energy investment
Solar investment as % of energy investment
2021
2022
2023
Source: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Favorable policies have boosted solar PV project installations:
Corporate tax incentives imposed by NDRC1 and State Tax Bureaus
Feed-in-tariffs mechanism for solar projects with national subsidies
50% VAT rebates to be refunded for product manufacturers2
Power procurement guarantees to ensure minimum solar power output by grids
Development of distributed PV market by promoting sale of residual power to neighbors for better returns
Aided private sector participation by ensuring project scale & opening more business models for distributed solar PV systems
Establishment of SECI4 as nodal agency for solar schemes through demand aggregation, capacity allocation & technical advisory services
National Solar Mission Setup in 2011, aiming to achieve 100 GW cumulative solar capacity by 2022 (57 GW achieved)
Financial incentives for uptake of distributed systems, indigenous manufacturing
PM-KUSUM scheme: ensuring energy security for farmers in India
10 GW target for grid-connected distributed solar panels, solarization of 2.7Mn. agri. Pumps
100% FDI under the automatic route for green energy sector
USD 3 Bn. funding under PLI3 schemes for domestic solar cell & module mfg.
Significant focus on funding solar projects through public budgets (>50% representation in USD 12.5 Bn. new RE acceleration plan to setup 196 solar plants)
Early regulation of utility-scale solar power plants, with well- defined, long-term targets for solar adoption at a national scale
Authorization of grid-connected distributed systems & financial incentives for their uptake (Eg: 100% compensation for every unit fed into grid by residential consumers) –distributed systems currently occupies 70% of total solar installed capacity
Exemption of import duty on solar panels, tax benefits for corporates that invest in solar-related R&D
1. National Development and Reform Commission; 2. Effective till Dec 2018; 3. Production
Linked Incentive; 4. Solar
Energy Corporation of India
Source: Include a source for every chart that you use. Separate sources with a semicolon; related
sources go at the end
Prohibitively high costs of capital & RoE expectations from solar project
Cost of capital (%)
Required rate of return
Weighted average cost of capital - OECD & China
Weighted average cost of capital - others
Impact of externalities resulting in reduced funding attractiveness of solar projects
Bureaucratic delays in approvals for solar project development, with limited process clarity leading to high transaction costs
High inflation rates dampening investor interest in long-tenure RE projects
Limited access to innovative & reliable financing instruments
Economically poorer EEs (Eg: Nigeria, Ghana, Bhutan) often find it difficult to attract strong financing mechanisms like catalytic finance due to insufficient guarantees to hedge against structural risks such as exchange rate volatilities
Overall operational and financial health of utilities
Loss incurred (FY21) (USD bn.)
Investor confidence is affected by payment delays, distribution underperformance (T&D losses), etc.
10-13x growth in storage capacities necessary for projected solar adoption rates
Storage deployment (TWh)
A mix of long and short duration storage solutions necessary to cater to on-grid & distributed demand
Storage deployment (TWh)
Source: Solar Adoption Mode
Transmission capacity (TW-miles)
India witnessed upto 30GW of Power Purchase Agreements remaining unsold in recently concluded auctions due to limited transmission infrastructure
In South Africa, only 1 GW was awarded out of the 4.2 GW under the latest renewable energy procurement program for independent power producers owing to limited grid capabilities
In Brazil, incentives for feeding in residual residentially generated solar energy were curtailed in January 2022, having exceeded capacity of the grid
Limited transmission capacity has led to curtailing 50%-70% of distributed solar being generated in China & subsequent roll-back of incentive schemes
Value stack of PV modules, %
PV production (from polysilicon to modules) accounts for ~55% of total system costs
Value stack of PV modules, %
The top 10 global PV cell manufacturers have 70% market share
China share of global PV component production, %(WoodMackenzie, ZBW)
There exists considerable potential for EEs to establish domestic solar PV manufacturing and assembly value chains to satisfy domestic demand while insuring themselves against global supply chain disruption risks
Sources: IRENA; IEA; News Media; WoodMackenzie; ZBW; Rethink Energy; Analysis
Value stack of PV modules, %
Cumulative GHG emissions for EE
Additional CO2 emissions saved in SHINE scenario
Lives saved from reduced GHG emissions
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Cumulative Jobs created due to Solar Penetration
Average jobs created per year by 2050
increment in operational jobs
increment in construction jobs
Environmental Benefits
Social Benefits
Economic Benefits
Adoption of best practices from successfully deployed global green policies
Regulations to reduce transaction costs of project development
Policies favouring domestic solar PV value chain creation (PLI schemes, tax credits, etc.)
Policies aimed at improving the financial health of utility companies
Enhanced transmission capacity & grid modernization to clear grid-locked projects
Investment in technical R&D (solar equipment efficiency, distributed RE systems, etc.)
Development of a robust data collection framework for solar projects
Prioritization of localized manufacturing and assembly of solar PV systems
Enabling access to large quantum of low-cost, low-risk climate finance
Governments to catalyze private sector financing of solar energy projects
Financing measures to provide temporary relief to loss-making utility companies
Establishment of engineering R&D institutions to accelerate technical capability
Development of a highly skilled workforce through large-scale training and awareness programs
Development of dedicated solar industrial zones for manufacturing & assembly
Enhance credibility of utility companies via grid management training
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Develop an in-depth understanding of effective green policies (financial incentive structures, carbon pricing schemes, etc.) with highest impact within the archetype and beyond & facilitate adoption of such best practices to enable green growth |
Uniform, accelerated policy deployment across nations via more efficient energy planning and by avoiding common pitfalls |
Supportive frameworks towards project development and implementation, including transparency in tendering processes, standardization of documentation, faster approval processes. |
Carbon pricing expected to accelerate investment in RE technologies, leading to deeper cost reductions of solar PV and associated storage systems |
Favourable policies towards solar PV value chain creation: Financial incentives like PLI schemes, capital investment subsidies, R&D tax credits, etc. Mandated local content requirements & govt. procurement |
Reduced transaction costs, delays and uncertainties in project development, boosting confidence of offtakers and investors alike |
Policy measures to improve financial health of utilities: Partial or complete privatization of distribution or generation assets_front of state-owned utilities wherever possible Debt restructuring of loss-making utilities by extending repayment periods, reducing interest rates, etc. India's UDAY (Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana) scheme focused on debt restructuting and improving operational efficiency of distribution cos. |
Establishment of solar PV value chain focused on cell manufacturing and module assembly to satisfy domestic demand Provide temporary financial support to loss- making electric utilities to improve their operational and financial efficiency for more effective investments into grid integration of solar energy |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Grid infrastructure improvement via expansion and modernization aimed at
|
Improvement in transmission infrastructure inline with incentive policy deployment, to ensure minimal delays in implementation of approved solar projects |
Investment in technical R&D in solar-focused topics:
|
Reduction in cost of solar PV and associated storage systems, improving its cost- competitiveness with alternate RE sources |
Development of advanced solar PV manufacturing facilities, raw material sourcing and process standardization & quality control |
Establishment of solar PV value chain focused on cell manufacturing and module assembly to satisfy domestic demand |
Robust data collection framework for financial and technical risk assessment of projects:
|
Increased transparency in solar energy project development process, with better visibility of risks involved for investors and offtakers Comprehensive view of the market for policymakers for informed decision-making |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Enhanced access to low-cost, low-risk finance:
|
Improve attractiveness of EEs as global investment hubs for the international private sector by managing financial risks & boosting investor confidence in projects |
Governments to catalyze active private sector participation in project financing:
|
Improved access to low-risk funding by incentivizing global and domestic private sector to invest across technologies (distributed solar systems, grid expansion and modernization, etc.) Improvement in investor confidence and development of a sustained pipeline of funds from multiple sources throughout the life of a project and improve financial health of utilities |
Measures to improve financial health of utilities:
|
Provide temporary financial support to loss-making electric utilities to improve their operational and financial efficiency for more effective investments into grid integration of solar energy |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Establishment of engineering, research and development and centers of excellence to accelerate technical expertise in storage solutions, with an increased focus on distributed access models |
One-stop destination for all solar-related technical discourses affecting the region Contribute to drop in costs of solar PV systems, storage solutions through innovation in R&D (eg: cell sizes, efficiencies, etc.) |
Development of a highly skilled workforce in solar energy through large-scale training and awareness programs in collaboration with global universities, national associations Adequate upskilling to ensure quality standards are met for O&M requirements of off-grid and grid-connected installations. |
Enhanced technical expertise and operational efficiency in solar energy adoption, including integration into the electricity grid – improvements in system downtime, reduced costs and enhanced reliability |
Development of solar manufacturing hubs and clusters to foster collaboration and reduce costs through shared resources |
Dedicated centers for localized sourcing of raw materials & domestic production of solar PV systems |
Train energy utility companies in integrating solar energy into national grids, ensuring smooth interconnection and addressing technical challenges like intermittency |
Build expertise in grid management, storage and demand response strategies Improve operational efficiency of utilities and enhance their credibility, in turn resulting in improved financial health in the long run |
Low-income countries (LICs) face significant energy access challenges, with large sections of the population lacking reliable and affordable electricity. Solar energy presents a unique opportunity to address this gap, offering the flexibility of small-scale off-grid solutions for dispersed settlements, as well as utility-scale systems for broader energy coverage.
However, LICs face barriers such as limited access to low-risk capital, high debt levels, and grid connectivity issues, which hinder the deployment of renewable energy technologies. Historically dependent on external assistance for clean energy funding, LICs must strengthen domestic institutions to act as enablers for financing and project development.
By 2050, LICs will require around $220 billion for solar PV and storage systems and an additional $470 billion for grid expansion. Policies that streamline approvals, incentivize local battery manufacturing, and promote intra-regional cooperation are essential. Additionally, building technical and financial capacity, along with fostering partnerships for large-scale training programs, will be crucial to unlocking solar’s potential and expanding energy access in LICs
LICs are expected to witness rapid economic growth in the future, faster than global average of 2.3%...
GDP (US$ trillions)
…leading to emergence of industrial and commercial sectors as electricity demand centers
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Transport
Others
Source: Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model
Energy consumption is expected to increase by ~45% by 2050
Electricity consumption (TWh)
Electricity access is projected to improve, with larger share of population able to satisfy basic requirements
% of population with access to electricity
Tier1 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
% of population (2022) | 16% | 30% | <1% | <1% | 1% |
% of population (2050) | 43% | 29% | <1% | <1% | 1% |
T1: Very low-load applications (task lighting, phone
charging, radio); T2: Low-load applications
(multiple lights, television, fan); T3: Medium-load applications (Refrigerator,
water pump, air cooer); T4: High-load applications (Washing machine, iron, dryer); T5: Very high-load
applications (air conditioner, electric cooker, etc.)
Source: World Bank, ESMAP, Solar Adoption Model
Minimum daily requirement (Wh)
Global avg. per capita daily electricity consumption
Source: World Bank, Energy Monitor, Linard et al. Population
Distribution,
Settlement Patterns and Accessibility across Africa in 2010.
Population density (people per km2)
Current installed capacity mix of LIC nations is heavily focused on fossil fuels….
…which are expected to turn lesscost-competitive compared to solar in the near-to-medium term
Levelized cost of electricity (USD/MWh)
Fossil fuel usage is expected to continue in the near future (atleast till 2028 – SHINE scenario) due to its economic viability in the short term
Continued investment in solar and RE technology solutions is will result in deeper cost reductions, helping achieve cost parity with fossil fuels faster
Source: IRENA, IEA, Solar Adoption Model
Investment requirements
US$
120-150Bn.
(~US$ 5-6 Bn. annually)
~0.9%-1%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
US$
~150-180Bn.
(~US$ 6-7 Bn. annually)
upto
~1.2%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
US$
~180-200Bn.
(~US$ 7-8 Bn. annually)
upto
~1.3%-1.5%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
Annual Investment in solar energy (USD bn.)
% of investment
Source: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Africa considered for illustration; views are replicable across LIC nations
High debt levels
Highest cost of capital among all archetypes (20% 30%)
Opaque nature of market, along with limited insurance against political risks
Poor financial health of offtakers (<50% profitable, 33% incur losses)
Faster economies of scale, leading to lowercapital investments
Large-scale social and economic impacts – additional income stream through exports, employment creation
Limited investor risk with centralization of infrastructure
Investment restricted to local T&D infrastructure to ensure last-mile delivery to consumers
Enhanced access to electricity
Source: Solar Adoption Model, IRENA
Investments in solar energy in the LICs have largely been externally funded, with majority from the international private sector
Cumulative investment in solar (2012-2021)
(USD Bn.)
Cumulative external investment in solar (2012-2021)
(USD Bn.)
World Bank, China, Russia, Japan, AfDB,
US, Italy – 75% of total
public
finance
The Market Development Credit Line (MDCL) is a credit facility for solar home systems amounting to $45.7 million disbursed by the World Bank and administered by the Development Bank of Ethiopia, over the course of 2012 2019. Over 800,000 solar lanterns and 10,000 home systems setup as part of the scheme.
Jointly operated by the Government of Uganda and Ugandan Electricity Regulatory Authority, the program aims to mobilize private sector investment in solar systems through top-up payments per kWh of generated electricity over the RE feed-in tariff, by utilizing EUR 90 mn. In grant funding from KfW development bank
Scaling Solar is a World Bank Group project-based loan and payment guarantee with political risk insurance, aimed at rapid implementation of frid-connected solar PV projects along with advisory services. In Zambia, the Government of the Republic of Zambia administers over $100 mn. In financing for the project
There is a need for government institutions that act as demand centers, funnel investments and build technical capabilities
(TWh)
Storage deployment (TWh)
Source: Solar Adoption Model, IRENA
Current capabilities in LICs are largely focused on mining:
Mining constitutes 25% of exports in atleast 20 LICs globally
Capital & technology intensive with unfavorable working conditions
Lack of reliable, affordable electricity for downstream activities
High logistics-related costs (250% higher than global avg.) due to poor connectivity conditions
Refining and manufacturing processes are capital & technology intensive, requiring significant investments
Source: Solar Adoption Model, IRENA
Upstream inputs
$55 bn.
Manufacturing
$1.86 Trillion
Last mile & end-use
$7 Trillion
$10bn investment in battery manufacturing in 2021
Restrictions on export of raw materialswithout processing
$10bn investment in battery manufacturing in 2021
Restrictions on export of raw materialswithout processing
Regional cooperation with efforts to act towards a common vision is key to aggregate battery demand & setup a robust battery supply chain in LICs
Source: EU Commission JRC Science for Policy Report (2016); IEA, The Role of Critical
Minerals
in Clean
Energy Transitions (2021); Expert Interviews; analysis
Cumulative GHG emissions for EE
Additional CO2 emissions saved in SHINE scenario
Lives saved from reduced GHG emissions
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Cumulative Jobs created due to Solar Penetration
Average jobs created per year by 2050
increment in operational jobs
increment in construction jobs
Environmental Benefits
Social Benefits
Economic Benefits
Development of a robust framework for energy policies & planning
Regulations to reduce transaction costs of project development
Transparency in tendering and auctioning processes
Favourable policies aimed at establishing a robust battery value chain
Grid expansion and modernization to meet industrial demand
Investment in technical R&D (solar equipment efficiency, battery cell chemistry, etc.)
Development of a robust data collection framework for solar projects
Promotion of regional grid integration & inter-regional power trading
Enabling access to large quantum of low-cost, low-risk climate finance
Creation of an environment for active private sector participation in financing solar projects
Strengthen capabilities of local financial institutions & domestic green banks
Establishment of government institutions to offer support to solar projects across the value chain
Development of a highly skilled workforce through large- scale training and awareness programs
Active participation in regional and international workshops and conclaves on solar energy adoption
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Translation of NDCs into a robust internal framework for energy policies and long-term project planning focusing on grid modernization, incentive mechanisms (feed-in tariffs, RE certificates, competing fossil fuel subsidies, etc.), investment mobilization and strengthening utility capacities |
Improvement in investor confidence in solar projects with visibility of roadmap towards increased solar adoption |
Supportive frameworks towards project development and implementation, including standardization of documentation, faster approval processes |
Policy-backed steps (carbon pricing, tax credits and incentive schemes for private sector) to effect faster drop in cost of solar and associated storage solutions, targeting more rapid economic viability |
Transparent process of procuring solar generation capacity for offtakers to support long-term PPAs involving private sector |
Reduced transaction costs, delays and uncertainties in project development, boosting confidence of offtakers and investors alike |
Favourable policies aimed at establishing a robust battery value chain: Regulatory frameworks that allow intra-regional cooperation (eg: joint planning of infrastructure & financing, technical standardization, duty-free trade of energy equipment, etc.) Incentivization of local battery refining and manufacturing like tax credits, PLI schemes, etc. Improve global market access for local manufacturers through facilitation of preferential trade agreements |
Enhanced regional cooperation among neighbouring countries towards a common goal of establishing a robust battery supply chain Favourable policies that support establishment and development of downstream industries |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Grid infrastructure improvement via expansion and modernization aimed at
|
Improvement in grid infrastructure to handle variability in supply from solar energy & regional integration to promote cross-border trading of electricity |
Investment in technical research & development in solar-focused topics:
|
Reduction in cost of solar PV and associated storage systems, improving its cost-competitiveness with fossil fuels Identification of region-specific value pools in the battery supply chain Enhanced reliability of electricity access, along with reduction in generation losses |
Robust data collection framework for financial and technical risk assessment of projects:
|
Increased transparency in solar energy project development process, with better visibility of risks involved for investors and offtakers Comprehensive view of the market for policymakers for informed decision-making |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Enhanced access to low-cost, low-risk finance :
African Trade Insurance Agency provides investment insurance against expropriation ofassets_front, trade embargoes & currency inconvertibility Credit guarantees, asset re-financing and innovative products to manage high cost of capital |
Improve attractiveness of LICs as global investment hubs for solar energy by managing financial risks & boosting investor confidence in projects |
Enable an environment for active private sector participation in project financing:
Financial incentives such as tax credits and import duty waivers, cost-reflective tariffs, reduced transaction costs, PLI schemes for local manufacturing, etc |
Improved access to low-risk funding by incentivizing global and domestic private sector to invest across technologies (distributed solar systems, grid expansion and modernization, raw material refining, battery chemistry & manufacturing, etc.) Reduced transaction costs, delays and uncertainties in project development, boosting confidence of offtakers and investors alike |
Domestic green banks and local financial institutions to build expertise in project risk assessment & unlock access to external capital assistance, especially for small and medium-scale solar projects |
Improve local financial capacity building to facilitate interaction between project developers and financial institutions & improve process transparency |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Establishment of government institutions to facilitate demand aggregation, project planning and implementation, investment mobilization, technical assistance, etc |
Improved regional cooperation among neighbouring countries for energy trading One-stop destination for all solar-related discourses affecting the region, incl. demand planning, investments, etc. |
Development of a highly skilled workforce in solar energy through large-scale training and awareness programs in collaboration with global universities, national associations Adequate upskilling to ensure quality standards are met for O&M requirements of off-grid and grid-connected installations. |
Enhanced technical expertise and operational efficiency in solar energy adoption, including integration into the electricity grid – improvements in system downtime, reduced costs and enhanced reliability. |
Active participation in regional and international workshops and conclaves on solar energy adoption with a view to build reliable global partnerships for solar-related trade (eg: batteries) |
Facilitate sharing of advanced technologies, best practices and innovative solutions across regions Improve global market access to local suppliers, manufacturers and private sector organizations |
Small Island Developing States (SIDS) face unique challenges due to their heavy dependence on imported fossil fuels, which make up 10- 20% of GDP, and their vulnerability to global price fluctuations. To enhance energy security, SIDS must prioritize resilient solar systems and climate finance. Solar energy offers a pathway to reduce fossil fuel dependence and build climate-resilient energy systems capable of withstanding extreme weather events.
The geographic isolation and dispersed populations of SIDS make grid expansion difficult, requiring distributed solar solutions. Despite these challenges, the economic viability of solar energy positions it as the optimal energy source for SIDS, with projected solar penetration reaching 50% by 2050.
To achieve this, SIDS will need an estimated $102 billion for solar PV and storage systems, along with $544 billion for grid expansion by 2050. Key enablers include policies to integrate solar into climate targets, investments in R&D for solar and storage solutions, and access to low-cost finance to support project development
Economic Growth
SIDS are expected to witness healthy economic growth, in line with global average of 2.3%...
GDP (US$ trillions)
Emissions
…and is expected to witness the simultaneous decoupling of emissions from economic growth
Emissions intensity of GDP (MatCO2e/Tn. USD)
Source: Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model
SIDS has lowest share in electricity consumption due to low population but has high per capita consumption
GDP (US$ trillions)
GDP growth is expected to reflect in higher electricity consumption by industrial, service (incl. tourism) sectors
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Transport
Source: IEA, Solar Adoption Model
High dependence on fossil fuel which is sensitive to price fluctuations in the market with 10-20% of GDP as import cost
Low market strength due to limited demand
High dependence on fossil fuels leading to GHG emissions
Greatest threat from global GHG related climate change due to rising sea level
High dependence on fossil fuel which is sensitive to price fluctuations in the market with 10-20% of GDP as import cost
Low market strength due to limited demand
High dependence on fossil fuels leading to GHG emissions
Greatest threat from global GHG related climate change due to rising sea level
Levelized cost of electricity (USD/MWh)
Solar energy is expected to compete with wind energy, but will turn more viable latest by 2045 (Slow transition scenario)
Continued investment in solar and storage solutions will result in deeper cost reductions, helping achieve cost parity with other RE sources faster
There exists a need for additional policies (eg: carbon pricing) to drive investments in solar & improve its cost-competitiveness
Source: IRENA, IEA, Solar Adoption Model
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Generally easier to extend to un-electrified regions |
Practical where economies of scale cannot justify grid extension |
Less susceptible to power outages |
Can provide power for low density population areas far from electrified sources |
Non-lucrative for small and remote households with low ownership of electrical appliances |
Require trained personnel and funds to maintain and perform repairs |
Prone to vandalism & movement of people (e.g. tribal) make the outputs uncertain |
High upfront cost for solar, battery required |
Diesel generators have low upfront cost but produced GHG emissions |
Source: Mulenga et al. (2023), Breyer et al.(2009)
At 4 MW, annual diesel consumption can reach 4.4 mn litres with twice the LCOE of solar + storage
Despite the low initial investment, diesel is costlier to produce electricity, with direct correlation with oil prices
Diesel also does not mitigate the risk of external dependence since most of SIDS do not have oil reserves and need to import it.
Source: Mulenga et al. (2023), Breyer et al.(2009)
Relative small physical size, geographic isolation and high dependence on international trade make SIDS ‘price-takers’
in Fiji George Dreg aso, of Fiji's National Disaster Management Office, told the Associated Press that about 80% of the nation's 900,000 people ware without regular electricity supplies.
The hulaKane left mole than two•thitds of homes on the Dutch side of the island of St Martin uninhabitable, with no electricity, gas or drinking water, and four people confirmed dead.
Homes have been flattened, schools have been destroyed, telecommunications have been cut off and the island's main hospital is still without electricity, he said.
An optimal mix of distributed solar solutions in total RE mix will be key in achieving resilience against large intensity weather events
SIDS have historically relied on external assistance for their clean energy initiatives1
Investment requirements
US$
30-35Bn.
(~US$ 1-1.2 Bn. annually)
~0.3%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
US$
~50Bn.
(~US$ 1.7-2 Bn. annually)
upto
~0.5%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
US$
~60-65Tn.
(~US$ 2-2.5 Bn. annually)
upto
~0.6%
Of GDP in estimated timeframe
~2x growth in storage capacities necessary for projected solar adoption rates
Storage deployment (TWh)
Greater amount of storage required in SHINE as solar penetration increases due to more variability
Storage deployment (TWh)
Source: Solar Adoption Mode
In 2024, solar power offers cheaper long-term electricity than diesel but faces high upfront costs, similar to diesel generators in 2003.
Learnings for solar adoption
In Mauritius, electricity access was improved by prioritizing poor households and utilizing local resources like bagasse, offering a model for today's Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to enhance solar energy access and capacity.
Learnings for solar adoption
In 2013, the Bahamian hotel industry, in partnership with the government, launched an energy efficiency program that conducted energy audits & recommended improvements, helping hotels reduce their energy costs (15-20% of operating budgets)
Learnings for solar adoption
In Cuba, past electrification efforts focused on centralized energy systems, but after extreme weather events, the country shifted to localized, resilient solutions, offering a model for today's SIDS.
Learnings for solar adoption
Source: Surroop et al (2018)
Cumulative GHG emissions for EE
Additional CO2e emissions saved in SHINE scenario
Lives saved from reduced GHG emissions
Source: Solar Adoption Model
Cumulative Jobs created due to Solar Penetration
Average jobs created per year by 2050
increment in operational jobs
increment in construction jobs
Environmental Benefits
Social Benefits
Economic Benefits
Create policies for energy development, including solar in climate targets.
Establish independent regulatory bodies for rule-making and monitoring
Separate grid-based and off-grid responsibilities for better resource use
Policies aimed at improving the financial health of utility companies
Enabling access to large quantum of low-cost, low-risk climate finance
Governments should drive private sector participation with blended finance, incentives, and innovative financial mechanisms
Improve utility financial health through results-based financing and direct capital infusion
Modernize grid infrastructure for smoother solar integration and inter regional power trading
Investment in technical R&D (solar equipment efficiency, distributed RE systems, etc.)
Fund institutions for R&D, commercialization, and piloting new solar technologies
Develop robust data collection for financial and technical risk assessment in projects
Establish R&D centers focused on storage solutions and distributed access models
Development of a highly skilled workforce through large-scale training and awareness programs
Foster collaborative research with other countries to address SIDS-specific needs and build homegrown talent
Partner with international entities for training, technical support, and climate finance implementation strategies in SIDS
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Create a comprehensive policy to dictate government actions and future plans to address issues on energy development through treaties, legislations and public policy strategies Incorporate Solar in NDC commitments as specific targets to reach climate commitment |
Lack of defined plan for energy transition and improving access Absence of long-term commitment to renewable targets |
Create an independent multi-member regulatory body with rule-making and adjudicative powers Create frameworks for effective monitoring of electrification program |
Lack of legal framework for IPP and PPA along with regulatory framework for protecting private investor's interests Gap between policy targets and implementation |
Distribution of grid-based actions and off-grid capability enhancement to two different authorities Ensure fairness, consistency and optimum use of financial resources |
Conflict of interest and monopolization of energy authority leading to preferential treatment between on-grid and off-grid expansion |
Policy measures to improve financial health of utilities: Partial or complete privatization of distribution or generation assets_front of state-owned utilities wherever possible Debt restructuring of loss-making utilities by extending repayment periods, reducing interest rates, etc. |
Provide temporary financial support to loss-making electric utilities to improve their operational and financial efficiency for more effective investments into grid integration of solar energy |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Grid infrastructure improvement via expansion and modernization aimed at:
|
Difficulty in grid extensions to remote area warranting distributed systems to bring electricity access |
Investment in technical R&D in solar-focused topics:
|
Reduction in cost of solar PV and associated storage systems, improving its cost-competitiveness with alternate RE sources |
Investment in leading institutions for R&D, marketing and commercialization of new technologies in storage, PV and DRES. Serve as pilots for latest technologies |
Reduction in cost of solar PV and associated storage systems, improving its cost-competitiveness with alternate RE sources |
Robust data collection framework for financial and technical risk assessment of projects:
|
Increased transparency in solar energy project development process, with better visibility of risks involved for investors and offtakers Comprehensive view of the market for policymakers for informed decision-making |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Enhanced access to low-cost, low-risk finance : Credit guarantees, asset re-financing and innovative products to manage high cost of capital Insurance against macroeconomic factors like political risk, currency risk, inflation, etc. |
Improve attractiveness of EEs as global investment hubs for the international private sector by managing financial risks & boosting investor confidence in projects |
Governments to catalyze active private sector participation in project financing: Access to blended finance inline with private sector needs Financial incentives such as tax credits and import duty waivers, cost-reflective tariffs, reduced transaction costs, PLI schemes for local manufacturing, etc Innovative financial mechanisms like catalytic financing to mobilize private investments from initial public funding |
Improved access to low-risk funding by incentivizing global and domestic private sector to invest across technologies (distributed solar systems, grid expansion and modernization, etc.) Improvement in investor confidence and development of a sustained pipeline of funds from multiple sources throughout the life of a project and improve financial health of utilities |
Measures to improve financial health of utilities: Results-based financing (grants/subsidies) from governments or other financial institutions (eg: based on T&D loss reduction, increasing RE integration, etc.) Direct capital infusion for state-owned utilities for temporary relief |
Provide temporary financial support to loss-making electric utilities to improve their operational and financial efficiency for more effective investments into grid integration of solar energy |
Recommendation | Barrier addressed |
---|---|
Establishment of engineering, research and development and centers of excellence to accelerate technical expertise in storage solutions, with an increased focus on distributed access models |
One-stop destination for all solar-related technical discourses affecting the region Contribute to drop in costs of solar PV systems, storage solutions through innovation in R&D (eg: cell sizes, efficiencies, etc.) |
Development of a highly skilled workforce in solar energy through large-scale training and awareness programs in collaboration with global universities, national associations Adequate upskilling to ensure quality standards are met for O&M requirements of off-grid and grid-connected installations. |
Reduction in cost of solar PV and associated storage systems, improving its cost-competitiveness with alternate RE sources |
Sister/satellite institutions to perform collaborative research with other countries for technological breakthrough specific to SIDS requirements and eventually develop homegrown talent |
Small market size of SIDS makes customized solutions more expensive to be built (e.g. disaster resistant solar PVs) |
Collaboration with developed countries, international financial institutions, development partners and international organizations to provide training and technical support on the ground and to support strategies to strengthen SIDS in effective implementation of climate finance |
Lack of training and of strong financial institutions and mechanisms in SIDS countries to effectively mobilize, access and implement climate funding |
Achieving large-scale solar energy adoption requires tailored strategies and global cooperation to address the unique needs of different archetypes. High-income countries (HICs) are poised to stabilize emissions, leveraging policies like carbon pricing and private sector investments to lead the transition. However, emerging economies face a dual challenge of fostering rapid economic growth while decoupling emissions, necessitating government-led investments and initiatives to incentivize private sector participation. Low-income countries (LICs) and Small Island Developing States (SIDS) require tailored strategies, focusing on decentralized and off-grid solar solutions for LICs and energy storage systems for SIDS to enhance resilience against climate risks.
Critical risks such as limited supply chain diversification, geopolitical tensions, and policy implementation roadblocks threaten the solar transition across archetypes. Addressing these challenges demands mitigating financial, political, and technological barriers through robust policies, cross-border collaboration, and efficient funding mechanisms. Key actions include facilitating private sector financing, establishing global carbon pricing systems, and promoting technology transfer agreements to standardize and diffuse solar technology globally. Moreover, enhancing institutional capacities through training programs and regional hubs will empower stakeholders across all archetypes.
To realize the envisioned solar adoption levels, the study outlines a clear path forward centered on collaboration and continuous improvement. This involves introducing archetype-specific, tailored programs, regularly assessing their progress and impact, and publishing annual reports reflecting macroeconomic conditions and solar transition updates. By fostering a consistent, global, concerted effort, this approach ensures an equitable, solar-centric energy transition capable of meeting climate goals and delivering socio- economic benefits. This strategy underscores the transformative potential of solar energy in addressing global energy and environmental challenges.
High Income Countries
Economic growth of HICs is expected to stabilize, with climate action ensuring HICs are no longer largest contributors to global GHG emissions
Policy mechanisms like incentive schemes and carbon pricing have already helped catalyze private sector investments in solar energy in HICs
Domestic demand for solar components outstrips domestic manufacturing capacity, amplifying the need for clean energy assistance in select EEs & LICs to build robust supply chains
Interventions aimed at transitioning legacyassets_front worth 2.6 TW to green energy generation and reduction in GHG emissions is the need of the hour
Emerging Economies
Emerging Economies are expected to witness rapid economic growth, along with simultaneous decoupling of emissions
Currently, governments contribute significantly towards solar investments, with private sector involvement yet to be catalyzed
Emerging Economies need to focus on incentivizing private sector participation in solar projects, adoption of global best practices & development of local value chains to drive cost reductions
Planned storage, transmission & distribution capacities are well short of requirements, with unsold PPAs & grid- locked projects across nations
Low Income Countries
Owing to low electricity requirements to enable access
& dispersed nature
of settlements, small-scale, off-grid
solutions hold the key to driving electricity access
Solar emerges as the ideal energy source of choice for LICs due to its versatility of being deployed at any scale & expected economic viability in near-to-medium term
LICs are largely dependent on external assistance for clean energy funding, with domestic institutions acting as enablers of fund disbursal
Nations should focus on expanding on the availability of raw material for battery manufacturing and tap into the downstream value chain. Interventions aimed at unlocking access to low-cost finance and empowering local financial institutions are critical.
Small Island Developing States
Due to their unique geography, SIDS face increased climate risk making RE transition not just a sustainability goal but a necessity for energy security and resilience against climate disasters
SIDS face extreme energy security risks due to high reliance on imported fuels. Transitioning to renewables like solar and storage protects them from supply disruptions and global price volatility
SIDS require significant storage capacity to stabilize solar energy, as their small grids are more vulnerable to variability and weather disruptions compared to larger nations with interconnected grids.
To meet clean energy goals, SIDS must double investment levels, prioritizing access to low-cost, low- risk finance, while empowering domestic institutions to streamline disbursement
Risk | Implication |
---|---|
Limited diversification of solar PV, battery supply chains beyond existing regionally localized value chains |
|
Rise in geopolitical tensions |
|
Roadblocks in energy policy implementation, incentive schemes for RE & solar adoption |
|
Limited private sector participation in clean energy project funding |
|
Competing development priorities (esp. in EEs, LICs) due to political, financial demands |
|
Limited cross-border technology transfer, IP sharing between archetypes |
|
Technological
Political risks
Financial
Introduce archetype-specific, tailor-made programs for solar adoption through interaction with ISA representatives & relevant ground-level authorities
Understand progress & impact of each program on a regular basis through comprehensive data collection
Publish an annual report with latest global macroeconomic conditions & its implications for a solar-centric transition
The 2000-2001 energy crisis exposed California’sover-reliance on non-renewable sources
Growing concerns about air pollution, energy security, and climate change increased the pressure to diversify energy sources
California, with abundant sunshine, recognized solar energy as a key renewable resource
The California Solar Initiative (CSI) was launched in 2007 to drive solar adoption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions
Performance-based rebates provided for installing PV systems across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors
3,000 MW of solar installations planned under the Go Solar California campaign
Large initial state funding allowed for widespread consumer access to financial incentives, making solar more affordable in a high- income state with significant policy support for green initiatives
Program fostered competition among installers, driving innovation and efficiency
Initial goal of 3,000 MW of solar capacity surpassed in 2016. 49.4 GW installation in 2024
~80,000 jobs created in California’s solar industry
CSI helped position California as the leading solar market in the U.S., contributing to 14.5% of the state’s total electricity from solar by 2020
However, the program's reliance on financial rebates highlighted concerns regarding sustainability after rebates ended, and costs for lower-income consumers remained a challenge
Strong government backing: Effective government policies and leadership are crucial to drive solar adoption
Financial incentives: Offering subsidies, rebates, or tax incentives to make solar installations more affordable
Performance-based reward structure: Implementing a systemthat rewards high-quality solar installations to ensure long-termperformance and reliability
Policy alignment with local market conditions: Adjusting policy frameworks to fit the unique economic and regulatory landscapes of each country
Financial viability without long-term rebates: Ensuring that solar adoption remains economically sustainable even as financial incentives like rebates phase out
Ethiopia has one of the lowest electricity access rates in Africa, with a significant portion of the population living in off-grid areas
The country’s energy mix is heavily reliant on hydropower, which is vulnerable to climate related disruptions such as droughts, necessitating diversification
With abundant solar resources, Ethiopia sought to scale up solar energy as part of its broader effort to improve energy accessand energy security
In partnership with the World Bank, Ethiopia launched the Scaling Solar initiative, aiming t quickly deploy large-scale solar projects.
The initiative used competitive reverse auctions to attract private sector investment, ensuring cost- efficient solar deployment
Long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) were offered to developers to guarantee stable revenue streams, making the projects financially attractive
Scaling Solar’s streamlined approvals and minimized bureaucratic hurdles in projects
Ethiopia added ~500 MWof solar capacity through Scaling Solar
Solar power has become more affordable due to competitive pricing, improving access to clean electricity in rural and underserved areas
While Scaling Solar has been effective in driving utility-scale solar growth, grid limitations and delays in regulatory processes remain challenges to further scaling
The reliance on external funding highlighted the importance of securing long-term financial sustainability
Strong partnership with the World Bank and use of reverse auctions to lower solar costs.
Long-term PPAs providing stable revenue for solar developers
Ethiopia’s abundant solar potential and growing energy demand
Limited grid capacity to absorb new solar generation
Delays in regulatory approvals and project execution
Securing long-term financial sustainability beyond external funding soures
South Africa has long relied on coal for electricity generation, with coal power accounting for over 80% of the country’s energy mix
Frequent power shortages and rolling blackouts (load shedding), caused by theaging coal infrastructure, underscored the need for diversification and reliable energy solutions
The country's strong solar potential due to abundant sunshine, coupled with the need for greater energy security, positioned solar as a viable alternative
South Africa launched the Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme (REIPPPP), which aims to attract private investment in renewable energy projects, including solar
Through competitive bidding processes, solar projects were awarded long-term contracts to supply electricity to national grid
The government also supported smaller-scale solar rooftop installations through financial incentives and streamlined approvals particularly in high demand urban area
South Africa installed over 2 GW of solar capacity through the REIPPPP by 2020
Solar energy helped alleviate pressure on the grid, reducing the frequency of power outages and providing a cleaner, more reliable energy
Job creation in the renewable energy sector, particularlyin rural areas where solar farms were built, provided economic benefits
However, the slow pace of grid modernization and the ongoing reliance on coal limited the impact of renewable energy adoption
Strong solar potential due to abundant sunshine throughout the year
REIPPPP attracting private investment through long-term contracts
Financial incentives for small-scale solar installations inurban areas
Slow grid modernization efforts limiting the integration of solar power
Continued reliance on coal due to political and economic factors
Ensuring widespread adoption of solar in lower-income communities and rural areas
Historically, the UK relied heavily on coal for electricity generation, but climate change concerns and the need to phase out coal by 2024 shifted the focus to renewable energy
The UK government set ambitious targets for decarbonization, including significant investments in solar energy to reduce carbon emissions and increase energy security
With less favorable weather conditions compared to other countries, the UK had to explore innovative ways to maximize its solar potential, particularly through large-scale solar farms
The UK government introduced Contracts for Difference (CfD), a financial mechanism that guaranteed a fixed price for electricity generated by renewable energy projects, including solar farms providing a stable revenue stream for developers, encouraging investments in large-scale solar farms
The government streamlined the planning process for solar farm development and provided grants to support RE infrastructure
Integration with battery storage systems ensure stable energy in limited sunlight
Solar farms have significantly contributed to the UK’s renewable energy mix, with solar energy accounting for approximately 4% of the country’s electricity generation
The CfD mechanism has attracted investment in large-scale solar projects, helping the UK meet climate goals and phase out coal power
Solar farms have created jobs and contributed to economic growth in rural areas
Contracts for Difference (CfD) providing financial stability for investors in solar farms
Government grants and streamlined planning processes for renewable energy projects
Strong government commitment to phasing out coal and promoting renewable energy
Public opposition to large-scale solar developments in certain regions
Upgrading grid infrastructure to accommodate increased solar energy generation
Managing intermittency of solar energy, particularly in less sunny regions
China, the world’s largest consumer of coal, recognized the need to reduce pollution and shift toward cleaner energy sources in theearly 2000s
The Chinese government viewed renewable energy, particularly solar, as a strategic industry for economic growth and global competitiveness
China’s high manufacturing capacity and state-controlled economy provided the foundation for scaling up solar production rapidly
Extensive government subsidies, low-cost loans, and export incentives to state-owned and private solar panel manufacturers
Focused on scaling up production to drive down costs, improve technology, and achieve efficiency through economies of scale
Emphasis on exporting solar panels to global markets drove China as world’s largest producer of solar equipment by 2011
Between 2010 and 2020, global solar panel costs decreased by over 80%, largely driven by China’s scaled-up production
China became both the largest producer and exporter of solar panels, accounting for a significant share of global solar installations
Despite rapid growth, China’s domestic solar market faced challenges such as overcapacity and reliance on government subsidies, which at times led to market imbalances
Government subsidies and export incentives, supportedby cheap capital
Economies of scale in solar manufacturing allowed China to dominate global markets
Strong government backing positioned China as a global leader in solar energy
Managing overcapacity in the manufacturing sector and balancing supply-demand
Reliance on government subsidies, which raised concerns about long-term market stability
Navigating fluctuations in global demand and maintaining competitive pricing amidst international trade challenges
Germany faced increasing public opposition to nuclear energy following the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, pushing the country to search for safer alternatives
High dependence on imported fossil fuels and a desire to enhance energy security drove the need for a comprehensive energy transition
As a high-income country with strong industrial capacity, Germany had the economic resources and public will to invest in large-scale renewable energy, laying the foundation for Energiewende
The 2000 Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), provided Feed- in Tariffs (FiTs) that guaranteed RE producers fixed, above-market prices for electricity fed into the grid
Long term contracts in Solar PV systems encouraged investment across sectors
Significant investment in domestic pane manufacturing and grid modernization
FiTs were progressivelyreduced to reflect falling technology costs
Transition plan to retrain and reskill coal workers to enter new industries, esp. RE
Solar energy now contributes around 13% of Germany’s electricity generation
The FiT model accelerated development of solar, making Germany a leader in RE capacity while avoidingnuclear and coal reliance
Rising consumer energy costs due to renewable surcharges and grid bottlenecks highlights the need for further reforms
Grid modernization lags behind the growth in solar energy, creating delays in accommodating renewable energy and occasionally increasing reliance on coal
Strong legislative support through the EEG and FiTs offering financial stabilityfor investors
Public support for renewable energy, driven by environmental consciousness and opposition to nuclear power
A strong industrial base that enabled solar manufacturing and R&D investment
Rising consumer costs due to renewable energy surcharges
Dependence on coal power during the nuclear phase-out, highlighting the need for faster grid modernization Balancing the need for economic growth with the environmental goals of reducing emissions
In 2011, the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) was established as a specialized public sector enterprise under the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE)
Formed as a public sector enterprise (PSE), SECI was set up to implement India’s ambitious National Solar Mission goals with a mandate to implement the National Solar Mission’s ambitious targets, including 100 GW of solar power by 2022
A dedicated agency with RE expertise streamlined solar policy implementation
SECI was designed as a specialized agency to facilitate implementation of solar projects and coordinate among various stakeholders—MNRE, state governments, and private companies
Collaborated with state governments to establish solar parks, facilitating land acquisition and infrastructure development
Structured financial models like Viability Gap Funding (VGF) to reduce investor risks and ensure project viability
India’s solar capacity grew from less than 3 GW in 2014 to over 40 GW by 2021 due to SECI’s role in organizing solar parks and facilitating reverse auctions
SECI’s competitive bidding process led to India achieving some of the world’s lowest solar tariffs, making solar power economically competitive with fossil fuels
SECI also acted as a bridge between local developers and international financiers such as World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and various climate funds to drive solar projects
Strong government backing through policies under the National Solar Mission
As a dedicated agency for solar, SECI was able to concentrate exclusively on solar development
Continuous and sustained government policy, such as the Renewable Purchase Obligation (RPO) mandates, create long- term demand for solar energy
SECI’s decision-making is bound by governmental procedures and bureaucratic approvals
SECI relies heavily on state governments for securing land for solar parks slowing projects
As government subsidies like (VGF) are reduced, SECI faces challenges in maintaining investment momentum
Brazil has historically relied heavily on hydropower for electricity generation, but droughts caused by climate change have made theenergy supply less reliable
Increasing energy demand and the growing need for energy diversification pushed the Brazilian government to explore alternative sources, including solar power
Brazil’s favorable climate for solar energy, combined with high electricity costs, created ideal conditions for the expansion of distributed solar generation
In 2012, Brazil introduced net metering regulations, enabling residential and commercial consumers to install solar panels and feed excess electricity back to the grid
Consumers receive credits on their electricity bills for the surplus power generated, incentivizing investments in rooftop solar
Tax incentives further reduced the cost of solar installations
Distributed solar systems is being adopted by households and small businesses to reduce operational costs and reliance on the grid
Brazil reached over 7 GW of distributed solar capacity by 2020 increasing to 45 GW in 2024
The system has led to significant reductions inelectricity bills, contributing to wider solar adoption and improved energy security
The initiative has also created~165000 jobs in the solarsector by 2020, from installation to maintenance
Challenges remain in ensuring equitable access to solar energy for lower-income households and upgrading grid infrastructure to accommodate distributed generation
Strong regulatory framework through net metering to incentivize small-scale solar adoption
Tax incentives that made solar systems more affordable for residential and commercial consumers
Brazil’s favorable solar potential, with abundant sunshine throughout the year
Upgrading grid infrastructure to handle distributed generation and balance supply-demand
Ensuring solar adoption is equitable and accessible to lower-income households Managing financial sustainability as net metering scales and balancing grid stability
Kenya’s rural areas have long struggled with limited access to electricity, with many households relying on expensive and harmful kerosene for lighting
Extending the national grid to these remote areas is both financially and logistically challenging, prompting the need for decentralized, clean energy solutions
As mobile phone penetration soared across Kenya, mobile money systems like M-PESA became widely used, creating a foundation for pay-as-you- go (PAYG) models for solar
Launched in 2012, M-KOPA Solar provides solar home systems (SHS) through a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) financing model
Customers make small, manageable payments through M-PESA, Kenya’s mobile money platform, to pay for the system over time, reducing the burden of upfront costs
Each SHS typically includes PV panels, lighting, phone chargers, and radios, offering reliable power tooff-grid homes
As of 2021, over 800,000 households have gained access to electricity through M-KOPA’s solar home systems
Kerosene use has decreased significantly, leading to health improvements and reduced indoor air pollution
The initiative has also created jobs in distribution, maintenance, and sales of solar systems
The key challenge remains ensuring long-term maintenance and affordability for the lowest- income consumers
Integration with M-PESA, allowing easy mobile payments for off-grid consumers
Flexible PAYG model reducing the financial burden of upfront solar installation costs
Supportive government environment and partnerships with international donors to expand reach
Ensuring long-termmaintenance of solar systems in remote areas
Affordability for the poorest households, even with small payment increments
Limited infrastructure in rural areas may hinder the expansion of distribution networks
Rwanda, like many low-income countries, faced significant challenges in providing reliable grid access to rural areas
The high costs of extending the national grid to remote regions, coupled with low population density, made grid expansion financially impractical
Off-grid solar systems emerged as a scalable solution to meet rural energy needs and improve electricity access in underserved areas
Rwanda’s government partnered with private companies to deploy off-grid solar home systems (SHS) through a pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) financing model
Households paid small, regular installments via mobile money platforms, allowing them to afford the SHS without large upfront costs
The initiative was supported by international donors and public- private partnerships, allowing for wider distribution across rural areas
By 2021, over 500,000 households were connected to off-grid solar systems (source: Rwandan Ministryof Infrastructure)
This significantly improved living conditions, replacing kerosene lamps with cleaner, safer solar lighting
Improved access to electricity positively affects education and healthcare, with rural schools and clinics benefiting from reliable power
However, affordability for the lowest-income households and long-term system maintenance remained ongoing challenges
Flexible PAYG model making solar affordable through small, regular payments
Integration with mobile money platforms for easy and accessible payments
Support from international donors and public-private partnerships to scale distribution
Long-term maintenance and servicing of off-grid solar systems in remote areas
Ensuring affordability for the poorest households, even with PAYG financing
Building a sustainable supply chain to ensure reliable availability of solar products
Fiji, a Small Island Developing State (SIDS), is highly vulnerable to climate change, with rising sea levels and extreme weather events threatening its energy infrastructure
The country heavily relies on imported fossil fuels for electricity generation, making it vulnerable to global fuel price fluctuations and supply chain disruptions
With its abundant solar resources, Fiji recognized the need for decentralized, renewable energy solutions to reduce reliance on imports and increase resilience to climate change
Fiji’s government introduced decentralized solar systems, particularly for remote and rural communities, which are harder to connect to the national grid
The initiative was supported by international donors and development organizations that helped fund solar projects and promote energy resilience
Solar mini-grids and standalone solar home systems were integrated with disaster-resilient technologies, such as battery storage, to ensure consistent energy supply during extreme weather events
Decentralized solar systems improved energy access for thousands of Fijians living in remote areas, reducing reliance on diesel generators
Shift to solar power increased resilience against weather and enhanced energy security by reducing dependence on imported fuels
Solar installations contributed to Fiji’s goal of achieving 100% renewable energy by 2030, helping the country reduce GHG emissions
Scaling solar faces challenge due to the high upfront costs and the need for ongoing international support
Supportive government policies prioritizing energy resilience and renewable energy
International funding and donor support for decentralized solar projects
Strong focus on integrating disaster- resilient technologies with solar installations
High upfront costs of solar installations, especially in rural and remote areas
Reliance on international funding for expanding renewable energy infrastructure
Scaling solar to meet the entire country’s energy needs remains an ongoing challenge
The Maldives is one of themost climate-vulnerable nations, with rising sealevels threatening its landand infrastructure
The country has long relied on imported diesel for power generation, leading to high energy costs and carbon emissions
Recognizing the need to reduce diesel dependency and adapt to climate change, the Maldives turned to innovative solar solutions, including floating solar projects
The Maldives developed floating solar farms on artificial platforms or rafts, which are anchored to the sea or lagoons, conserving the limited land space while generating renewable energy
The government partnered with international donors and private investors to fund and implement these solar projects
These floating solar farms are integrated with battery storage is designed to minimize environmental impacts while maximizing solar energy production, even during extreme weather conditions
Floating solar farms provided the Maldives with a sustainable, space-efficient renewable energy source, reducing the dependency on diesel
Maldives has reduced its carbon emissions and improved energy security in the face of climate- related challenges
These projects are also seenas a model for other low-lying island nations facing similar threats from rising sea levels
High costs of implementing and maintaining floating solar systems and the complexity of marine-based operations, remain challenges
Government commitment to reducing reliance on diesel and adapting to climate change
Strong international partnerships and donor support for funding floating solar projects
Innovative use of limited space by leveraging floating solar technologies
High upfront costs of developing and maintaining floating solar farms
Complexity in maintaining marine- based solar systems, especially in harsh weather conditions
Dependence on continued international funding and technological expertise
Morocco has limited domestic fossil fuel resources, relying heavily on energy imports to meet its growing energy demands
The government sought to reduce energy dependence and position the country as a leader in renewable energy, particularly solar, given Morocco’s high levels of solar radiation
The launch of the Noor Solar Complex was part of Morocco’s national energy strategy to achieve 52% of its energy generation from renewables by 2030
The Noor Solar Complex, locatedin Ouarzazate, is one of the world’s largest concentrated solar power (CSP) plants, designed to generate electricity even during non-sunlight hours through thermal storage
The project was developed in multiple phases, combining CSP with photovoltaic (PV) technology to maximize solar output
Supported by the Moroccan government, international donors, and private investors, the project leveraged financing from the World Bank, European Investment Bank, and other international institutions
The Noor Solar Complex has a total installed capacity of over 500 MW, significantly reducing Morocco’s reliance on imported fossil fuels
The project helped avoid~690000 tons of carbon emissions annually making Morocco a regional leader in renewable energy
It created thousands of jobs, particularly during the construction phase, and spurred economic development in the Ouarzazate region
Challenges include high initial capital costs and the need for continued investment to scale similar projects across the country
Strong government commitment to renewable energy through national energy policies
International funding and partnerships with global financial institutions
Morocco’s geographic advantage with high solar radiation levels, supporting CSP and PV technologies
High upfront costs of concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies
Long-term sustainability depends on continued investment and grid integration
Scaling similar projects across Morocco to meet growing energy demands
GDP (US$ Tn.) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 53.7 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 53.7 |
EE | 32.67 | 36.97 | 44.51 | 52.57 | 60.90 | 69.46 | 78.04 |
LIC | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.85 | 0.99 | 1.16 | 1.33 |
SIDS | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.93 | 1.05 | 1.16 | 1.27 | 1.37 |
Global | 87.62 | 94.84 | 108.06 | 121.16 | 134.49 | 148.22 | 162.08 |
Population (billion) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.18 |
EE | 5.43 | 5.56 | 5.78 | 5.97 | 6.14 | 6.28 | 6.39 |
LIC | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 1.17 | 1.29 |
SIDS | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
Global | 7.31 | 7.52 | 7.85 | 8.16 | 8.44 | 8.71 | 8.94 |
Energy consumption (TWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 66,739.31 | 67,473.82 | 67,473.82 | 69,445.52 | 70,145.55 | 70,642.82 | 70,935.58 |
EE | 99,911.71 | 100,680.8 | 101,896.2 | 102,589.9 | 102,896 | 102,897.3 | 102,269.1 |
LIC | 1,224.35 | 1,081.02 | 1,180.47 | 1,280.82 | 1,382.93 | 1,484.49 | 1,582.26 |
SIDS | 1,657.02 | 1,712.20 | 1,749.77 | 1,772.54 | 1,778.64 | 1,771.87 | 1,757.19 |
Global | 169,532.39 | 170,947.84 | 173,370.21 | 175,088.78 | 176,203.12 | 176,796.48 | 176,544.13 |
Electricity consumption (TWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 11,237.47 | 11,646.13 | 12,570.46 | 13,338.90 | 14,101.93 | 14,897.67 | 15,733.42 |
EE | 16,401.22 | 18,575.80 | 21,319 | 23,467.34 | 25,636.78 | 27,913.56 | 30,305.58 |
LIC | 174.77 | 175.81 | 189.77 | 202.16 | 215.51 | 230.45 | 247.24 |
SIDS | 131.93 | 138.97 | 158.71 | 177.32 | 194.74 | 213.85 | 233.87 |
Global | 27,945.39 | 30,536.72 | 34,237.94 | 37,185.71 | 40,148.96 | 43,255.54 | 46,520.11 |
RE penetration in elec. generation |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 43.4% | 50.2% | 59.1% | 65.4% | 72.2% | 81% | 91.4% |
EE | 21.7% | 21.6% | 34.5% | 41.5% | 49.8% | 58.3% | 68% |
LIC | 86% | 85.5% | 84.7% | 83.8% | 83% | 82.2% | 82% |
SIDS | 13.9% | 20.5% | 30.6% | 33.5% | 39.4% | 58.5% | 59.5% |
Global | 31% | 33% | 44% | 50% | 58% | 66% | 76% |
Solar penetration in elec. generation |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 4.4% | 5.4% | 7.3% | 10% | 13.6% | 18.5% | 27.1% |
EE | 4.5% | 5.9% | 8.2% | 12.9% | 19.8% | 21.2% | 23.5% |
LIC | 1.7% | 3.4% | 5.5% | 9.1% | 14.9% | 23.9% | 40.0% |
SIDS | 1.3% | 2.2% | 4.2% | 5.6% | 7.1% | 9.4% | 12.7% |
Global | 4.4% | 5.7% | 7.9% | 11.8% | 17.5% | 20.3% | 24.7% |
Solar installed capacity (TW) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 1.07 | 1.53 | 2.18 | 3.18 |
EE | 0.53 | 1.1 | 1.86 | 2.98 | 4.71 | 6.22 | 8.22 |
LIC | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
SIDS | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.01 | 0.014 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
Global | 1.03 | 1.61 | 2.63 | 4.08 | 6.28 | 8.46 | 11.50 |
Storage requirement (TWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.57 | 0.95 | 1.45 | 2.1 | 3.05 | 4.32 | 6.65 |
EE | 2.96 | 4.48 | 6.37 | 9.75 | 15.06 | 20.04 | 27.41 |
LIC | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.23 |
SIDS | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.14 |
Global | 3.78 | 5.70 | 8.11 | 12.16 | 18.42 | 24.68 | 34.42 |
LCOE - solar ($/MWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 51.01 | 48.48 | 38.04 | 36.01 | 29.50 | 27.86 | 26.26 |
EE | 36.31 | 35.30 | 27.70 | 26.22 | 21.48 | 20.28 | 19.13 |
LIC | 66.60 | 65.26 | 52.24 | 38.36 | 33.49 | 30.13 | 26.74 |
SIDS | 39.1 | 38.29 | 30.65 | 22.51 | 19.65 | 17.67 | 15.69 |
LCOE - solar + storage ($/MWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 67.61 | 64.63 | 52.02 | 49.26 | 42.05 | 39.68 | 31.56 |
EE | 52.52 | 51.45 | 41.69 | 39.48 | 34.03 | 32.10 | 24.42 |
LIC | 82.65 | 81.41 | 60.41 | 38.36 | 33.49 | 30.12 | 26.74 |
SIDS | 55.40 | 54.44 | 44.64 | 35.76 | 32.2 | 29.49 | 20.99 |
Transmission requirement (Mn. TW-miles) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global | 43.61 | 45.19 | 50.14 | 53.95 | 58.51 | 63.9 | 70.37 |
Investment in solar + storage (US$ Tn.) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.86 | 1.46 | 2.24 | 3.38 | 4.44 |
EE | 0.63 | 1.41 | 3.48 | 5.54 | 8.19 | 10.90 | 12.83 |
LIC | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.16 |
SIDS | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
Global | 0.96 | 1.99 | 4.94 | 7.95 | 11.85 | 16.09 | 19.69 |
Investment in grid expansion (US$ Tn.) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global | 0.29 | 0.95 | 3.92 | 6.20 | 8.94 | 12.17 | 16.05 |
RE penetration in elec. generation |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 43.4% | 54.3% | 76.0% | 80.1% | 86.2% | 94.0% | 97.5% |
EE | 21.7% | 29.1% | 52.0% | 57.7% | 63.9% | 70.8% | 78.5% |
LIC | 86% | 85.5% | 84.7% | 83.8% | 86.0% | 93.6% | 92.2% |
SIDS | 13.9% | 32.1% | 63.0% | 63.5% | 85.0% | 85.0% | 100.0% |
Global | 31% | 39% | 61% | 66% | 72% | 79% | 85% |
Solar penetration in elec. generation |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 4.4% | 5.7% | 18.6% | 29.3% | 36.0% | 42.1% | 45.5% |
EE | 4.5% | 8.1% | 20.1% | 26.0% | 31.1% | 37.4% | 45.1% |
LIC | 1.7% | 4.5% | 11.7% | 31.8% | 40.6% | 51.9% | 66.3% |
SIDS | 1.3% | 3.8% | 8.9% | 11.7% | 15.5% | 20.6% | 27.8% |
Global | 4.4% | 7.1% | 19.5% | 27.1% | 32.8% | 39% | 45.2% |
Solar installed capacity (TW) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.49 | 0.58 | 1.82 | 3.45 | 3.94 | 4.51 | 5.08 |
EE | 0.53 | 1.25 | 4.06 | 5.85 | 7.08 | 8.74 | 10.80 |
LIC | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
SIDS | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
Global | 1.03 | 1.84 | 5.90 | 9.35 | 11.10 | 13.36 | 16.04 |
Storage requirement (TWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.78 | 1.53 | 3.49 | 7.78 | 8.91 | 10.18 | 11.88 |
EE | 2.97 | 5.00 | 11.90 | 15.75 | 21.01 | 28.27 | 38.32 |
LIC | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.31 |
SIDS | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.21 |
Global | 4.01 | 6.79 | 15.66 | 23.82 | 30.36 | 38.90 | 50.73 |
LCOE - solar ($/MWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 50.24 | 48.44 | 37.96 | 27.33 | 23.42 | 21.10 | 19.13 |
EE | 33.47 | 32.52 | 25.48 | 18.35 | 15.72 | 14.16 | 12.84 |
LIC | 64.51 | 58.79 | 48.45 | 37.88 | 30.72 | 27.27 | 24.42 |
SIDS | 37.84 | 34.49 | 28.43 | 22.22 | 18.02 | 16 | 14.33 |
Solar penetration in elec. generation |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 66.63 | 64.59 | 51.95 | 40.59 | 35.97 | 32.92 | 24.43 |
EE | 49.71 | 48.67 | 39.47 | 31.60 | 28.27 | 25.98 | 18.14 |
LIC | 78.30 | 69.12 | 48.45 | 37.88 | 30.72 | 33.09 | 29.72 |
SIDS | 52.37 | 50.39 | 43.55 | 37.34 | 31.76 | 29.30 | 27.21 |
Transmission requirement (Mn. TW-miles) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global | 43.61 | 46.88 | 55.43 | 59.15 | 63.59 | 68.82 | 74.2 |
Investment in solar + storage (US$ Tn.) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.24 | 0.44 | 2.27 | 3.61 | 4.61 | 5.80 | 6.40 |
EE | 0.78 | 1.72 | 5.91 | 7.92 | 10.12 | 12.67 | 14.20 |
LIC | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.21 |
SIDS | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
Global | 1.18 | 2.67 | 10.12 | 13.91 | 17.55 | 21.76 | 24.41 |
Investment in grid expansion (US$ Tn.) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global | 0.64 | 1.96 | 7.09 | 9.32 | 11.98 | 15.12 | 18.34 |
RE penetration in elec. generation |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 43.4% | 54.3% | 76.0% | 80.1% | 86.2% | 94.0% | 97.5% |
EE | 21.7% | 29.1% | 52.0% | 57.7% | 63.9% | 70.8% | 78.5% |
LIC | 86% | 85.5% | 84.7% | 83.8% | 86.0% | 93.6% | 92.9% |
SIDS | 13.9% | 32.1% | 63.0% | 63.5% | 85.0% | 85.0% | 100.0% |
Global | 31% | 39% | 61% | 66% | 72% | 79% | 85% |
Solar penetration in elec. generation |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 4.4% | 5.7% | 18.6% | 33.4% | 47.2% | 64.6% | 83.9% |
EE | 4.5% | 8.1% | 20.1% | 28.9% | 38.4% | 51.2% | 68.3% |
LIC | 1.7% | 4.5% | 11.7% | 33.2% | 44.2% | 58.8% | 78.4% |
SIDS | 1.3% | 3.8% | 8.9% | 13.6% | 20.9% | 32.1% | 50.0% |
Global | 4.4% | 7.1% | 19.5% | 30.4% | 41.5% | 55.8% | 73.5% |
Solar installed capacity (TW) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.49 | 0.60 | 1.84 | 3.73 | 5.08 | 7.03 | 9.58 |
EE | 0.53 | 1.465 | 4.827 | 6.573 | 8.772 | 11.930 | 16.20 |
LIC | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.018 | 0.049 | 0.069 | 0.095 | 0.137 |
SIDS | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.015 | 0.026 | 0.045 | 0.08 |
Global | 1.03 | 2.07 | 6.70 | 10.36 | 13.95 | 19.10 | 26.01 |
Storage requirement (TWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.78 | 1.58 | 3.62 | 7.81 | 10.72 | 15.29 | 22.12 |
EE | 2.91 | 5.53 | 12.73 | 17.37 | 24.52 | 37.78 | 50.33 |
LIC | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.35 |
SIDS | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.25 |
Global | 3.94 | 7.38 | 16.63 | 25.48 | 35.61 | 53.48 | 73.05 |
LCOE - solar ($/MWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 49.84 | 43.5 | 28.49 | 20.85 | 18.85 | 17.16 | 15.76 |
EE | 28.03 | 25.35 | 16.6 | 12.15 | 10.99 | 10 | 9.18 |
LIC | 64.25 | 58.1 | 38.06 | 27.83 | 25.17 | 22.81 | 20.94 |
SIDS | 37.70 | 34.09 | 22.33 | 16.33 | 14.77 | 13.38 | 12.29 |
LCOE - solar + storage ($/MWh) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 64.06 | 59.65 | 42.48 | 34.10 | 31.41 | 28.98 | 21.06 |
EE | 43.38 | 41.5 | 30.59 | 25.40 | 23.54 | 21.82 | 14.48 |
LIC | 77.82 | 68.44 | 38.06 | 27.83 | 25.17 | 28.63 | 24.12 |
SIDS | 52.57 | 50.24 | 37.18 | 31.18 | 27.32 | 25.2 | 23.41 |
Transmission requirement (Mn. TW-miles) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global | 43.61 | 46.88 | 55.43 | 58.47 | 64.42 | 73.2 | 86.64 |
Investment in solar + storage (US$ Tn.) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIC | 0.51 | 0.74 | 3.04 | 5.51 | 7.55 | 10.43 | 12.25 |
EE | 1.38 | 2.44 | 6.82 | 9.17 | 12.61 | 17.29 | 19.59 |
LIC | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.22 |
SIDS | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.10 |
Global | 2.07 | 3.78 | 11.90 | 17.40 | 23.55 | 31.99 | 37.19 |
Investment in grid expansion (US$ Tn.) |
2022 | 2025 | 2030 | 2035 | 2040 | 2045 | 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global | 0.64 | 1.96 | 7.09 | 9.20 | 12.77 | 18.03 | 26.09 |
Economic |
HIC 2030 2040 2050 |
EE 2030 2040 2050 |
LIC 2030 2040 2050 |
SHINE Scenario SIDS 2030 2040 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Input Parameters |
||||
Population growth (mn) |
1,231 1,231 1,231 |
1,231 1,231 1,231 |
1,231 1,231 1,231 |
1,231 1,231 1,231 |
Population growth (mn) |
$61,899 1,231 1,231 |
1,231 1,231 1,231 |
1,231 1,231 1,231 |
1,231 1,231 1,231 |
Population growth (mn) |
$39,797 $44,647 $48,032 |
$4,879 $5,910 $7,474 |
$695 $781 $858 |
$8,777 $10,945 $14,371 |
Drivers |
||||
Total annual investments in solar energy technology (Cumulative) (bn USD) |
$3,042 $7,552 $12,248 |
$6,820 $12,608 $19,586 |
$93 $141 $220 |
$24 $52 $102 |
Govt Solar expenditure (bn USD) |
$48 $56 $63 |
$101 $138 $177 |
<$1 <$1 <$1 |
$2 $2 $3 |
Ancillary infrastructure investment (bn USD) |
$2,631 $4,181 $6,043 |
$4,164 $7,150 $11,248 |
$128 $294 $470 |
$166 $354 $544 |
Fiscal policies |
Advanced incentives for large scale solar setups through tax credits or grants |
Performance-based subsidies and tariff reforms that support solar investments |
Microfinance schemes and tax exemptionsdecentralized solar solutions in rural off-grid regions |
Climate-linked financing instruments to fund resilient, community-based solar projects |
Impact |
||||
Employment growth (mn) |
4.5 7.8 12.2 |
16.4 21.9 31.2 |
1.5 2.1 2.9 |
0.1 0.2 0.2 |
Share of imports in fossil fuel usage |
25% 16% 14% |
24% 14% 11% |
34% 41% 34% |
54% 45% 39% |
Source: World Bank, Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model, Digital portals of representative countries, analysis
Environmental |
HIC 2030 2040 2050 |
EE 2030 2040 2050 |
LIC 2030 2040 2050 |
SHINE Scenario SIDS 2030 2040 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Input Parameters |
||||
Total electricity consumption (TWh) |
12,570 14,102 15,733 |
21,319 25,637 30,306 |
190 216 247 |
158.71 194.74 233.87 |
Solar irradiation potential (TWh) |
489,172 | 1,416,911 | 398,058 | 12,473 |
Drivers |
||||
Climate policies |
Higher carbon pricing, while linking solar subsidies to emission reduction targets |
Climate action plans that require solar power plants to meet a specific percentage of national energy needs |
Climate adaptation frameworks that emphasize decentralized solar solutions, ensuring energy access in rural areas |
Regulatory framework to fast- tracks solar projects in disaster- prone areas, pushing energy storage to reliability during extreme weather |
Installed capacities (TW) |
1.84 5.08 9.58 |
4.83 8.77 16.20 |
0.02 0.07 0.14 |
0.01 0.03 0.08 |
Impact |
||||
Share of solar energy in total installed capacity |
19% 47% 84% |
20% 38% 68% |
12% 44% 78% |
9% 21% 50% |
GHG emissions per capita (t CO2e/capita) |
9.87 9.52 9.96 |
5.52 5.30 5.17 |
1.26 1.11 1.04 |
3.43 3.03 2.98 |
Emission intensity of GDP (kg/$) |
0.20 0.17 0.15 |
0.75 0.56 0.44 |
1.55 1.21 1.04 |
0.26 0.20 0.17 |
Source: World Bank, Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model, Digital portals of representative countries, analysis
Social indicators |
HIC 2030 2040 2050 |
EE 2030 2040 2050 |
LIC 2030 2040 2050 |
SHINE Scenario SIDS 2030 2040 2050 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Impact |
||||
Share of population having access to electricity |
100% 100% 100% |
95% 100% 100% |
55% 64% 74% |
76% 79% 82% |
Energy affordability (Levelized cost of Energy) (USD/MWh) |
42.48 31.41 21.06 |
$31 $24 $14 |
$38 $25 $24 |
$28 $27 $18 |
Green employment growth (1000s) |
1,995 5,199 9,621 |
5,310 9,616 17,611 |
31 112 214 |
12 31 91 |
Additional Mortality incidents Avoided (1000s) |
850 2,991 4,888 |
2,281 8,615 14,154 |
0 1 29 |
26 96 177 |
Source: World Bank, Oxford Economics, Solar Adoption Model, Digital portals of representative countries, analysis
International Solar Alliance Secretariat Surya Bhawan, National Institute of Solar Energy Campus Gwal Pahari, Faridabad-Gurugram Road, Gurugram, Haryana - 122003, India
Email: info@isolaralliance.org